The American Civil Liberties Union of North California et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

Filing 56

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DOCUMENT PRODUCTION SCHEDULE. Status Conference set for 6/23/2011 at 10:30 A.M. before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 4/13/2011. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 SOMNATH RAJ CHATTERJEE (CA SBN 177019) SChatterjee@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: 415.268.7000 / Facsimile: 415.268.7200 4 5 6 7 KATHERINE NOLAN-STEVAUX (CA SBN 244950) KNolanStevaux@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304-1018 Telephone: 650.813.5600 / Facsimile: 650.494.0792 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 8 [Additional Counsel on Signature Page] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 IAN HEATH GERSHENGORN Assistant Attorney General JOHN R. TYLER Assistant Branch Director TAMARA ULRICH Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20530 Telephone: (202) 305-1432 Fax: (202) 616-8470 Email: Tamara.Ulrich@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, ASIAN LAW CAUCUS, SAN FRANCISCO BAY GUARDIAN Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:10-cv-03759-RS JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DOCUMENT PRODUCTION SCHEDULE Judge: Hon. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendants. 28 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DOCUMENT PRODUCTION SCHEDULE CASE NO. 3:10-cv-03759-RS pa-1457603 1 2 3 The parties to this action, through their attorneys of record listed below, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS the parties conferred with Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on April 4, 2011 as 4 ordered by Judge Richard Seeborg to address their disputes regarding the production of 5 documents in response to the expedited March 9, 2010 Request and the non-expedited July 27, 6 2011 FOIA Request (which was added to this case on February 11, 2011); 7 8 9 10 11 WHEREAS the defendants have thus far identified approximately 35,000 pages of potentially responsive documents to the FOIA Requests; WHEREAS the defendants have processed a total of 3,835 pages in response to both FOIA Requests; WHEREAS Magistrate Judge Beeler, pursuant to Local Rule 72-1, agreed to issue an 12 Order pursuant to a stipulation detailing the schedule and procedure for further document 13 processing and production in this action; 14 IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED THAT: 15 1. The defendants shall complete production of documents responsive to the March 16 9th and July 27th FOIA Requests, subject to any claimed exemptions, within eight months of the 17 date of this order, absent a further order from the Court. 18 2. The defendants produce the responsive information, subject to any claimed 19 exemptions, to plaintiffs’ requests for aggregate data as defined in the March 9, 2010 FOIA 20 Request at subheading I. (3) (at Pages 3-4) within thirty days of the date of this order or state in 21 writing that there are no documents responsive to that portion of Plaintiffs’ request. 22 3. The FBI shall initially review and process all FBI generated documents as defined 23 in the March 9, 2010 FOIA Request at subheading I. (1) a, b, d, e, and h (at Pages 2-3) within 24 thirty days of this order. The FBI will complete further review and the defendants will produce 25 responsive documents, subject to any claimed exemptions, to this portion of the request within 26 two weeks thereafter. 27 28 4. The defendants shall review and process the remaining requests in the March 9, 2010 and July 27, 2010 FOIA Requests at a rate of 2,500 pages per month or more and in a JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DOCUMENT PRODUCTION SCHEDULE CASE NO. 3:10-CV-03759-RS pa-1457603 1 1 manner sufficient to meet the eight month deadline as set forth in Paragraph 1 above. With 2 regard to remaining requests, the defendants’ processing and production of information shall be 3 prioritized as follows: FBI generated documents regarding domain management, assessments, and 4 investigations as described in the March 9, 2010 FOIA Request at subheading I. (2) a and c (at 5 Page 2) shall be prioritized over the remaining materials in the FOIA requests; responsive 6 documents not generated by the FBI as well as the Virtual Academy online training courses shall 7 be given secondary priority, including textbook-related materials not generated by the FBI. The 8 defendants shall produce to the plaintiffs a list of the Virtual Academy online courses identified 9 by the defendants as responsive and the plaintiffs will promptly let the defendants know what 10 course materials they would like the defendants to process. With respect to the Virtual Academy 11 online courses, the defendants will be obligated to process only the material from those courses 12 identified by the plaintiffs. 13 5. The defendants shall provide status reports with each document production 14 detailing how many processors are working on the request, how many pages are in the processing 15 system and, for each of the work folders in the processing system, at what stage the work folders 16 are within in the processing system. 17 6. To address document processing and production issues, the parties shall 18 telephonically participate in status conferences regarding the pace and content of document 19 production at least every sixty days with the Court, Magistrate Judge Beeler presiding, as 20 scheduled by the Court. The parties will address the production of a Vaughn Index, a search 21 affidavit, and other issues in this action during subsequent status conferences. 22 7. 23 Local Rule 72-2. Any party may seek review of any subsequent order by the Magistrate Judge under 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DOCUMENT PRODUCTION SCHEDULE pa-1457603 2 1 Dated: April 13, 2011 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 By: /s/ Tamara Ulrich TAMARA ULRICH By: /s/ Somnath Raj Chatterjee SOMNATH RAJ CHATTERJEE IAN HEATH GERSHENGORN Assistant Attorney General JOHN R. TYLER Assistant Branch Director TAMARA ULRICH Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20530 Telephone: (202) 305-1432 Fax: (202) 616-8470 Email: Tamara.Ulrich@usdoj.gov SOMNATH RAJ CHATTERJEE (CA SBN 177019) SChatterjee@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: 415.268.7000 / Facsimile: 415.268.7200 Attorneys for Defendants FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE KATHERINE NOLAN-STEVAUX (CA SBN 244950) KNolanStevaux@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304-1018 Telephone: 650.813.5600 / Facsimile: 650.494.0792 JULIA HARUMI MASS (CA SBN 189649) JMass@aclunc.org ACLU FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 39 Drumm Street San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: 415.621.2493 / Facsimile: 415.255.8437 VEENA B. DUBAL (CA SBN 249268) VeenaD@asianlawcaucus.org ASIAN LAW CAUCUS 55 Columbus Avenue San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: 415.896.1701 / Facsimile: 415.896.1702 Attorneys for Plaintiffs THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHEN CALIFORNIA, ASIAN LAW CAUCUS, AND THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY GUARDIAN 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DOCUMENT PRODUCTION SCHEDULE pa-1457603 3 1 ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE 2 I, Katherine Nolan-Stevaux, am the ECF User whose ID and Password are being used to file this 3 Joint Stipulation Regarding Amended Complaint. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I 4 hereby attest that Somnath Raj Chatterjee and Tamara Ulrich have concurred in this filing. 5 6 Dated: April 13, 2011 By: /s/ Katherine Nolan-Stevaux 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DOCUMENT PRODUCTION SCHEDULE pa-1457603 4 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER Having reviewed the parties’ joint stipulation, 3 4 It is so ORDERED this 13th day of April, 2011. 5 Status Conferences set as follows: 6 June 23, 2011 at 10:30 a.m., August 25, 2011 at 10:30 a.m. and 7 October 27, 2011 at 10:30 a.m. 8 9 10 ______________________________________ Honorable Laurel Beeler United States Magistrate Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DOCUMENT PRODUCTION SCHEDULE pa-1457603 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?