Williams v. Sysco San Francisco, Inc. et al

Filing 20

DISCOVERY ORDER re 18 Letter filed by Sysco San Francisco, Inc.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/16/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2011)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

Northern District of California

6
7

DIWAN WILLIAMS,
No. CV10-03760 MEJ
Plaintiff,

8
v.
9

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE
(Dkt. No. 18)

SYSCO SAN FRANCISCO, INC., et al.,
10
Defendants.
_____________________________________/

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

The Court is in receipt of the parties’ joint discovery dispute letter, filed June 10, 2011. Dkt.

13
14

No. 18. Upon review of the letter, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows:

15

1)

Defendant shall respond to Request for Production Nos. 14 and 15, but limited to letters

16

issued: (a) from the time the attendance policy was in effect in April 2009 through Plaintiff’s

17

termination in 2010; (b) to union employees; and (c) for attendance-related matters.

18

Defendants may redact the names of the employees, but shall note if an employee is/was a

19

military service member.

20
21

2)

Defendant need not respond to Request for Production No. 16 as it is overbroad.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: June 16, 2011
_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
Chief United States Magistrate Judge