Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Council of Human Services
Filing
17
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman granting 14 Motion to Intervene (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EEOC,
12
13
14
Plaintiff(s),
v.
UNITED COUNCIL OF HUMAN
SERVICES,
15
Defendant(s).
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C10-3826 BZ
ORDER GRANTING
TANYA THOMPSON’S
MOTION TO INTERVENE
17
Before the Court is a motion to intervene from Tanya
18
Thompson, the claimant who initially filed the charge against
19
the defendant with the EEOC.
20
§ 2000e-5(f)(1), Thompson has the right to intervene in a
21
civil action brought by the EEOC.
22
Inc., 249 F.R.D. 588, 590 (E.D. Cal. 2008).
23
defendant have filed statements of non-opposition to
24
Thompson’s motion.
25
26
27
28
1.
Docket No. 14.
Under 42 U.S.C.
See EEOC v. ABM Industries
Both the EEOC and
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows:
The motion to intervene is GRANTED.
The hearing
scheduled for May 18, 2011 is VACATED.
2.
By no later than May 6, 2011, Thompson shall consent
to or decline magistrate judge jurisdiction.
1
The form
1
to consent to or decline magistrate judge jurisdiction may be
2
found on the Court’s website at:
3
http://www.cand.uscourts.gov
4
Dated: April 18, 2011
5
6
Bernard Zimmerman
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\EEOC V. UNITED COUNCIL OF HUMAN SVCS\ORDER GRANTING MOTION
TO INTERVENE.wpd
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?