Scala et al v. Citicorp Inc et al

Filing 36

ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/1/2011. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2011)

Scala et al v. Citicorp Inc et al

Doc. 36

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARY SCALA, Plaintiff, v. CITICORP INC., ET AL., Defendants. /

No. C 10-03859 CRB ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

Now pending before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (dckt. no. 14). At the motion hearing on January 28, 2011, the Court granted the parties leave to file supplemental briefs setting forth additional authority that was raised for the first time at the motion hearing. Plaintiffs filed their supplemental brief on February 7, 2011 (dckt. no. 33) and Defendants responded on February 17, 2011 (dckt. no. 35). The Court now requests additional input from the parties. In simultaneously-filed briefs of ten pages or less, the parties are to set forth their views of whether Plaintiffs' suit would be a "covered class action" within the meaning of 15 U.S.C. § 78bb(f)(5)(B)(i)(II), even if the Complaint were amended to include 49 or fewer plaintiffs. Briefs must be filed // // //

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

no later than 5:00pm on Tuesday, March 8. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 1, 2011

CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

G:\CRBALL\2010\3859\order re MTD(requestforbriefs).wpd

2