Micromedia B.V. v. Byteshield, Inc.

Filing 42

STIPULATION AND ORDER CHANGING THE TIME REQUIRED UNDER LOCAL RULE 7-2, re doc 41 filed by Jan Samzelius, Christian Olsson, ByteShield, Inc. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 3/24/2011. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2011)

Micromedia B.V. v. ByteShield, Inc.

Doc. 42

1 Stephen H. Sutro (SBN 172168) Jennifer Briggs Fisher (SBN 241321) 2 Jessica Arlauckas Bohl (SBN 250883) William J. Kennedy (SBN 275178) 3 DUANE MORRIS LLP Spear Tower 4 One Market Plaza, Suite 2200 San Francisco, CA 94105-1127 5 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] 6 E-mail: [e-mail] [e-mail] 7 [e-mail] 8 Attorneys for ByteShield, Inc., Defendant and Counter9 Complainant; Jan Samzelius and Christian Olsson, Defendants 10 11 12 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: 10-CV-03861 EDL STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING THE TIME REQUIRED UNDER LOCAL RULE 7-2 Date: April 25, 2011 Time: 1:30 p.m. Courtroom: E Judge: Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte Complaint Filed: August 27, 2010

MICROMEDIA, B.V., a corporation of The 14 Netherlands, dba MICROMEDIA A.D.S., 15 16 v. Plaintiff,

17 BYTESHIELD, INC., a California corporation; JAN SAMZELIUS, an individual; and CHRISTIAN 18 OLSSON, an individual, 19 20 BYTESHIELD, INC., 21 22 v. Counter-Complainant, Defendants.

23 MICROMEDIA, B.V., a corporation of The Netherlands, dba MICROMEDIA A.D.S., 24 Counter-Defendant. 25 26 27 28
DM1\2556954.1

CASE NO.: 10-CV-03861 EDL
STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING THE TIME REQUIRED UNDER L.R. 7-2

Dockets.Justia.com

1

WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation between the parties, Plaintiff Micromedia, B.V. filed

2 its Second Amended Complaint ("Complaint") on March 10, 2011; 3 WHEREAS the parties agreed at that time that a hearing on any responsive motions filed by

4 Defendants ByteShield, Inc., Jan Samzelius and Christian Olsson could be set for April 26, 2011; 5 WHEREAS Civil Local Rule 7-2(a) generally requires that "all motions must be filed, served

6 and noticed in writing on the motion calendar of the assigned Judge for hearing not less than 35 days 7 after service of the motion"; 8 WHEREAS counsel for Defendants have been informed that Judge Laporte is unavailable on

9 April 26, 2011, but law and motion matters will be heard at 1:30 p.m. on April 25, 2011; 10 WHEREAS Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on March 22, 2011, which is 34 days

11 before the date on which this motion could be heard; 12 WHEREAS Civil Local Rule 6-2 provides that the parties may file a stipulated request for an

13 order accelerating the time frames set forth in the Local Rules; 14 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the

15 undersigned counsel as follows: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DM1\2556954.1

1. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint on March 22, 2011. 2. Plaintiff will file its opposition on April 5, 2011, fourteen days after service of the motion. 3. Defendants will file their reply brief on April 11, 2011, six days after service of the opposition and fourteen days in advance of the hearing. 4. A hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss will be set for April 25, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. before Judge Laporte.

2

CASE NO.: 10-CV-03861 EDL

STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING THE TIME REQUIRED UNDER L.R. 7-2

1 2

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

3 DATED: 4 5 6 7 8 9 DATED: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

March 23, 2011

WASSERMAN,COMDEN,CASSELMAN & ESENSTEN, L.L.P. ROBERT L. ESENSTEN KATHRYN S. MARSHALL By: /s/ Kathryn S. Marshall KATHRYN S. MARSHALL Attorneys for Plaintiff, MICROMEDIA B.V., a corporation of The Netherlands, dba MICROMEDIA A.D.S.

March 23, 2011

DUANE MORRIS, LLP STEPHEN H. SUTRO JENNIFER B. FISHER JESSICA ARLAUCKAS BOHL By: /s/ Jennifer B. Fisher JENNIFER B. FISHER Attorneys for Defendant, BYTESHIELD, INC.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 24, 2011

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DM1\2556954.1

UNIT ED

17

Elizabeth Laporte United States Magistrate Judge

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

3

CASE NO.: 10-CV-03861 EDL

STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING THE TIME REQUIRED UNDER L.R. 7-2

A

C

LI

FO

D lizabeth Judge E

. Laport

e

R NIA

RT U O

NO

RT

H