McFarland v. County of Marin et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER RE VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 14, 2012. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

JOHN HOUSTON SCOTT (SBN 72578)
LIZABETH NAN DE VRIES (SBN 227215)
SCOTT LAW FIRM
1388 Sutter Street, Suite 715
San Francisco, California 94109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
ETHAN BALOGH (SBN 172224)
JAY A. NELSON (SBN 258431)
COLEMAN & BALOGH LLP
225 Bush Street, Suite 1600
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for the Plaintiff,
PETER M. MCFARLAND

SCOTT LAW FIRM

1388 S UTTER S TREET , S UITE 715
S AN F RANCISCO , CA 94109

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
PETER MCFARLAND,

Case No.: CV 10-3862 WHA

15
Plaintiff,
16
v.
17
18

COUNTY OF MARIN, JUSTIN ZEBB, ERIN
MITTENTHAL, and DOES 1-50, inclusive.

19

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Settlement Agreement
and Mutual Release executed by and between the parties identified herein, the undersigned,
counsel of record for plaintiff PETER MCFARLAND, and defendants COUNTY OF MARIN,
JUSTIN ZEBB and ERIN MITTENTHAL, respectively, do hereby agree and stipulate that the
above-captioned case be dismissed, in its entirety and with prejudice, as to all defendants. Each
party shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs.

27
28
-1STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2
3

Dated: June 29, 2011

SCOTT LAW FIRM

4
By:
5
6

/s/ John H. Scott
JOHN HOUSTON SCOTT
Attorneys for Plaintiff

7
8

MARIN COUNTY COUNSEL’S OFFICE

Dated: June 29, 2011

By:

9
10

SCOTT LAW FIRM

1388 S UTTER S TREET , S UITE 715
S AN F RANCISCO , CA 94109

11

/s/ Renee G. Brewer
RENEE G. BREWER
Attorneys for Defendants
County of Marin and Erin
Mittenthal

12
13

Dated: June 29, 2011

ONGARO BURTT & LOUDERBACK LLP

14

By:
/s/ Charles Louderback
CHARLES M. LOUDERBACK
Attorneys for Defendant Justin
Zebb

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL set forth above, the Court hereby
orders that:

4

1. The above-captioned case be dismissed, in its entirety and with prejudice.

5

2. Each party shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8
9
10

DATED:_____________, 2011
February 14,2012.
February 1, 2012.
_______________________________
William Alsup
HON. WILLIAM H. ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
United States District Court Judge

SCOTT LAW FIRM

1388 S UTTER S TREET , S UITE 715
S AN F RANCISCO , CA 94109

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45,
I, John H. Scott, the ECF User transmitting and filing this STIPULATION OF

3

DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH

4

PREJUDICE, attest that I have obtained the concurrences of Renee Brewer and Charles

5

Louderback on this filing. I declare the foregoing under the penalty of perjury.

6
7

DATED: June 29, 2011

SCOTT LAW FIRM
By:

8
9

/s/ John H. Scott
JOHN HOUSTON SCOTT
Attorneys for Plaintiff

10

SCOTT LAW FIRM

1388 S UTTER S TREET , S UITE 715
S AN F RANCISCO , CA 94109

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER