Terreri v. FTI Consulting, Inc. et al

Filing 8

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 7 Stipulation filed by UNUM Life Insurance Company of America. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/21/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2010)

Terreri v. FTI Consulting, Inc. et al

Doc. 8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

GOLDSTEIN, GELLMAN, MELBOSTAD & HARRIS, LLP LEE S. HARRIS- CSBN 076699 [e-mail] 1388 Sutter Street, Suite 1000 San Francisco, CA 94109-5494 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff ERIC TERRERI RIMAC MARTIN, P.C. ANNA M. MARTIN - CSBN 154279 MATTHEW A. HICKEY- CSBN 239364 [e-mail] [e-mail] 1051 Divisadero Street San Francisco, California 94115 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants FTI CONSULTING, INC. DISABILITY PLAN, UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC., UNUM GROUP, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIK TERRERI,

) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) FTI CONSULTING, INC. DISABILITY ) PLAN, UNUM LIFE INSURANCE ) COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC., UNUM ) GROUP, INC. DOES 1-100, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________________ )

E-FILING
CASE NO. CV-10-3867 EMC STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT ; ORDER Original Due Date: September 22, 2010 Current Due Date: October 4, 2010

-1S T I P U L A T I O N TO EXTEND TIM E FOR D E F E N D A N T S TO RESPOND TO COM P L A I N T CASE NO. C10-3867 EM C

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that defendants FTI CONSULTING, INC. DISABILITY PLAN, UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC., UNUM GROUP, INC. (collectively "Unum") may have an additional two weeks to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint, such that Unum's response is now due on or before October 4, 2010. Good cause exists for this extension because lead counsel for Unum has been out of the country, and requires this time to become familiar with the case. Pursuant to local rules, this document is being electronically filed through the Court's ECF System. In this regard, counsel for defendant hereby attests that (1) the content of this document is acceptable to all persons required to sign the document; (2) plaintiff's counsel has concurred with the filing of this document; and (3) a record supporting this concurrence is available for inspection or production if so ordered. SO STIPULATED. GOLDSTEIN, GELLMAN, MELBOSTAD & HARRIS, LLP

DATED: September 21, 2010

By:

/S/ LEE S. HARRIS LEE S. HARRIS Attorneys for Plaintiff ERIC TERRERI

RIMAC MARTIN, P.C.

DATED: September 21, 2010

By:

IT IS SO ORDERED: _________________ ATE T Edward M. Chen U.S. Magistrate Judge
UNIT ED
S DISTRICT

/S/ ANNA M. MARTIN ANNA M. MARTIN Attorneys for Defendants FTI CONSULTING, INC. DISABILITY PLAN, UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC., UNUM GROUP, INC.
C

RT U O

S

FO

S T I P U L A T I O N TO EXTEND TIM E ward M. Che d FOR Ju ge E D E F E N D A N T S TO RESPONDdTO COM P L A I N T

n

-2LI

R NIA

OO IT IS S

RDERE

D

NO

CASE NO. C10-3867 EM C

RT

H