Ansanelli et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 107

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Alsup terminating 101 Motion to Dismiss (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 ANGELA ANSANELLI and CHARLES ANSANELLI, No. C 10-03892 WHA Plaintiffs, v. 14 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., and SEQUOIA PACIFIC MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC., 15 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Defendants. / 16 17 An order granted in part and denied in part defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank’s motion to 18 dismiss plaintiffs’ second amended complaint, and granted plaintiffs leave to file a third amended 19 complaint, curing the identified deficiencies. Plaintiffs did so. Thereafter, JPMorgan Chase Bank 20 moved to dismiss again, noticing a hearing for June 2. The opposition deadline was yesterday, 21 May 12, but instead of an opposition, plaintiffs’ counsel filed a stipulation by all parties for leave 22 to file a fourth amended complaint and a fourth amended complaint. Although plaintiffs did not 23 submit a proposed order or style their filing as a stipulated request, their implicit request for an 24 order granting leave to file a fourth amended complaint is GRANTED. As such, defendant’s 25 motion to dismiss the third amended complaint is DENIED AS MOOT, and the hearing on June 2 is 26 VACATED. 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 13, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?