Litmon v. Brown

Filing 54

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 53 Stipulation filed by Edmund G. Brown, Kamala D. Harris. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/26/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
TAMAR PACHTER
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
DANIEL J. POWELL
Deputy Attorney General
State Bar No. 230304
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants

8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12
13

DAVID LITMON, JR.,

14

Plaintiff, STIPULATION EXTENDING
DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
v.
ORDER
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Governor of
California; and KAMALA D. HARRIS,
Attorney General of California,

15
16
17
18

C 10-03894 EMC

Defendants.

19
RECITALS

20
21

1.

On September 12, 2011, the Court granted Defendants’ Motion to Strike and Dismiss

22

Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. In its Order, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to file a

23

Second Amended Complaint within thirty days of its Order.

24

2.

On October 11, 2011, Plaintiff timely filed a Second Amended Complaint. Under

25

Rule 15(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, defendants have fourteen days to respond

26

to the Second Amended Complaint. Currently, defendants’ response is due October 25, 2011.

27
28

3.

The parties have agreed to provide defendants fourteen additional days in which to

respond to the Second Amended Complaint, through and including November 8, 2011.
1
Stipulation Extending Time for Defendants to Respond to Second Amended Complaint (C 10-03894 EMC)

1

4.

No other extensions of time have been requested in this case.
STIPULATION

2
3

Plaintiff in pro se, and defendants by and through their counsel hereby stipulate:

4

1. Defendants shall have until November 8, 2011 to respond to the Second Amended

5
6
7

Complaint.
Dated: October 24, 2011

Respectfully submitted,
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
TAMAR PACHTER
Supervising Deputy Attorney General

8
9
10

/s/ Daniel J. Powell

11

DANIEL J. POWELL
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants

12
13
14

Dated: October 24, 2011

/s/ David Litmon
DAVID LITMON
Plaintiff in pro se

15

20
21

By: Daniel J. Powell
Deputy Attorney General
Attorney for Defendant
IT IS SO ORDERED:

25

dward
Judge E

ER

H

28

RT

27

IT

NO

26

________________
Edward M. Chen
RED
U.S. District JudgeIS SO ORDE

UNIT
ED

24

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

23

S

22

R NIA

19

/s/ Daniel J. Powell

n

M. Che

FO

18

LI

17

I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Plaintiff in pro se
David Litmon.

A

16

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

2

Stipulation Extending Time for Defendants to Respond to Second Amended Complaint (C 10-03894 EMC)

DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC MAIL AND U.S. MAIL
Case Name:
No.:

David Litmon, Jr. v. Kamala D. Harris, et al.

C 10-03894 EMC

I declare:
I am employed in the Office of the Attorney General, which is the office of a member of the
California State Bar, at which member's direction this service is made. I am 18 years of age or
older and not a party to this matter. I am familiar with the business practice at the Office of the
Attorney General for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United
States Postal Service. In accordance with that practice, correspondence placed in the internal
mail collection system at the Office of the Attorney General is deposited with the United States
Postal Service with postage thereon fully prepaid that same day in the ordinary course of
business.
On October 24, 2011, I served the attached STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS’
TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT by placing a true copy
thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope in the internal mail collection system at the Office of the
Attorney General at 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000, San Francisco, CA 94102-7004,
addressed as follows:
David Litmon, Jr.
32314 Ruth Court
Union City, CA 94587
Email: [e-mail]
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California the foregoing is true
and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 24, 2011, at San Francisco,
California.
Susan Chiang
Declarant
SA2010102904

20544806.doc

/s/ Susan Chiang

Signature