Cobb et al v. Brede et al
Filing
111
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST re 106 Declaration in Support, filed by Ernest Brede. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 10/19/2012. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/19/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (cdnS, COURT STAFF).
A
H
ER
FO
a
Judge M
LI
RT
3 II Tel: 650.548.0100
Fax: 650.548.9741
4
a James
ria-Elen
NO
2 II 204 East Second Avenue, #331
San Mateo, CA 94401-3904
TED
GRAN
R NIA
S
UNIT
ED
Anthony V. Smith, Esq. (SBN 124840)
LA W OFFICE OF ANTHONY V. SMITH
RT
U
O
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
C
F
D IS T IC T O
R
Attorney for Defendants ERNEST BREDE, LUIS CONTRERAS,
PAUL KOEHLER, LARRY
ALAN
5 II LA VERDURE, DONALD SHOWERS, AARON LUCAS, STEVE MISTERFELD,
6 II SHUSTER,
and RICHARD
N
ASHE
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT
COURT
OF CALIFORNIA
10
)
11 II JONATHAN D. COBB, SR., and
WALTER ARLEN ST. CLAIR,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
v.
15
16 II ERNEST BREDE, LUIS CONTRERAS,
PAUL KOEHLER, LARRY LAVERDURE,
17 II DONALD SHOWERS, AARON LUCAS,
18 II STEVE MISTERFELD,
and RICHARD ASHE,
ALAN SHUSTER,
19
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
20
21
22
JUDGE:
Honorable
Maria-Elena
James
DECLARATION OF ANTHONY V.
SMITH RE REQUEST TO EXTEND
DISCOVERY DEADLINE TO
COMPLETE DEPOSITION OF JASON
COBB & TO EXTEND DATE FOR
FILING OF MOTION TO COMPEL
DEPOSITION TESTIMONY AND/OR
FOR SANCTIONS AS AGAINST JASON
COBB
Original Complaint Filed: August 31, 2010
Discovery Cut-Off: October 6,2011
Settlement Conference Date: October 18, 2011
)
)
23
Case No.: 3:10-CV-03907-MEJ
)
)
24
25
-----------)
I, Anthony
1.
26
27
including
28
knowledge
V. Smith, Esq., declare:
I am an attorney licensed to practice before all courts in the State of California
the United States District Court, Northern
of the facts contained
in this declaration
District of California.
I have personal
and could competently
testify to the same if
Declaration of Anthony V. Smith-Request to Extend Discovery Deadline & Discovery Motion Deadline
Page 1
called upon to do so in a court of law. I represent
2
plaintiffs
3
4
5
all currently
named defendants
sued by
in this action.
2.
As the court is aware, last week the court issued an Order Compelling
Cobb to appear for his deposition
Jason
on October 5, 2011, at 9:30 a.m. Mr. Cobb appeared as did
the undersigned.
However,
due to an apparent mix-up with the court reporter agency, no court
reporter appeared
for the deposition.
6
Eventually,
the deposition
commenced
on Tuesday,
7
October
11, 2011.
For the reasons stated below, the deposition
was not completed.
Pursuant to
8
9
10
this court's
to up to and including
11
12
13
order of October
3.
5,2011,
October
defendants
were granted leave to complete
13,2011.
During the course of Jason Cobb's
required the undersigned
the deposition
to following
during the course of a deposition.
Cobb deposition,
Judge James'
several matters arose that
standing order relating to disputes that arise
In fact, as Judge James'
Courtroom
Deputy (Brenda Tolbert)
14
and Law Clerk (Chris Nathan) are aware, Jason Cobb and I had two (2) conference
calls with
15
the court staff relating to the disputes that arose during the course of the deposition.
Pursuant to
16
17
Judge James'
18
respective
19
order issued by Judge James on September
20
standing order, Mr. Cobb and I agreed to draft ajoint
positions
4.
relating to, among other things, Mr. Cobb's
letter that states our
refusal to sign the protective
26,2011.
During the course of the deposition,
Mr. Cobb refused to answer a significant
21
number of deposition
questions
(most questions
of which Plaintiffs
and George Stock answered
22
without objection
during their respective
depositions).
During the course of his refusal to
23
24
25
26
27
answer these questions,
Mr. Cobb would assert objections
and asserted without any genuine or legitimate
5.
Cobb indicated
In the latter part of the afternoon
which I viewed as baseless,
frivolous
legal basis.
(somewhere
around 3:30 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.), Mr.
that he would only provide a specific number of hours for completion
of the
28
Declaration of Anthony V. Smith-Request to Extend Discovery Deadline
& Discovery Motion Deadline
Page 2
deposition. Around this same time period, he also claimed that he was not feeling well despite
2
the fact that he stated at the beginning of the deposition that he was prepared to go forward. At
3
one point he stated that "we're done" or words to that affect.
4
I was required to complete his deposition by Thursday, October 13,2011, he said that he was
5
Despite the fact that he aware that
not available on any other day this week because he had "other legal matters and deadlines" or
6
words to that affect. Therefore, the deposition was ended without being completed or
7
8
9
arrangements set for the continuation of the deposition. The complete transcript of Mr. Cobb's
deposition will be available in about two (2) weeks.
6.
10
Therefore, defendants request that time to complete the deposition of Jason Cobb
11
be extended to a date after the settlement conference in this matter which is set for Tuesday,
12
October 18, 2011.
13
Defendants further request that the date for the filing and the hearing on a
motion to compel further testimony and for sanction as against Jason Cobb be extended to a date
14
after the settlement conference. In light of the pending settlement conference, I would suggest
IS
case not settle at that time.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
18
foregoing is true and correct.
Date: ~
21
13(CJDI(
Any discovery disputes must be presented in compliance
with the undersigned's discovery standing order.
25
TED
GRAN
s
na Jame
aria-Ele
Judge M
ER
H
28
RT
27
LA W0'FFICE OF Esq.
Antl\bny V. Stitltf'f, ANTHONY V. SMITH
Attorney for Defendants ERNEST BREDE, LUIS CONTRERAS
PAUL KOEHLER, LARRY LAVERDURE, DONALD SHOWERS
AARON LUCAS, STEVE MISTERFELD, ALAN SHUSTER,
and RICHARD ASHE
NO
26
UNIT
ED
24
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
23
S
22
R NIA
20
FO
19
LI
17
that the court schedule a telephone/status conference after the settlement conference should the
A
16
N
D IS T IC T
R
Declaration of Anthony V. Smith-Request to Extend Discovery Deadline & Discovery Motion Deadline
OF
C
Page 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?