Cobb et al v. Brede et al

Filing 120

ORDER RE CHAMBERS COPIES. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/7/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2011)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

Northern District of California

3
4

JONATHAN D. COBB, SR., et al.,

5

Plaintiffs,

No. C 10-03907 MEJ
ORDER RE CHAMBERS COPIES

v.
6
ERNEST BREDE, et al.,
7
8

Defendants.
_____________________________________/

9
10

On November 2, Defendants electronically filed a motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. Nos.
114-15.) However, Defendants failed to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

Orders by not delivering to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day following the

13

day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed

14

electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case

15

number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Case

16

Management Standing Order, Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James, ¶ 6. The Court ordered

17

Defendants to submit a chambers copy of the above-referenced documents. Dkt. No. 119.

18

The Court is now in receipt of the submitted chambers copies, which do not comply with the

19

previous order. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS Defendants to re-submit chambers copies

20

of all documents related to their summary judgment motion. Defendants shall ensure that the copies

21

comply with the following requirements: ALL CHAMBERS COPIES OF ELECTRONICALLY

22

FILED DOCUMENTS MUST INCLUDE (1) ON EACH PAGE THE RUNNING HEADER

23

CREATED BY THE ECF SYSTEM, AND (2) ALL EXHIBITS WITH LABELED TAB

24

DIVIDERS.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: November 7, 2011
_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
Chief United States Magistrate Judge