Cobb et al v. Brede et al

Filing 77

DISCOVERY ORDER. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 9/1/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 Northern District of California 6 7 JONATHAN D. COBB, SR., et al., No. C 10-03907 MEJ Plaintiffs, 8 v. DISCOVERY ORDER 9 ERNEST BREDE, et al., 10 Defendants. _____________________________________/ 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 On September 1, 2011, the Court held a status conference regarding outstanding discovery 13 14 issues in this case. Based upon discussions at the hearing, the Court ORDERS as follows: 15 1) Depositions shall take place as follows: 16 a) Plaintiff Jonathan Cobb’s deposition shall take place on September 15, 2011. 17 b) Plaintiff Walter Arlen St. Clair’s deposition shall take place on September 20, 2011. 18 c) Third Party Jason Cobb’s deposition shall take place on September 27, 2011. Jason Cobb agreed on the record to accept service of the deposition subpoena by mail. 19 20 2) By September 8, 2011, Plaintiffs shall file with the Court and serve on Defendants’ counsel a 21 telephone number and email address at which they may be reached personally. Plaintiffs 22 shall be considered on notice of any information sent via the email address provided. At the 23 September 1 hearing, Mr. Arlen St. Clair stated that his email address would be provided, 24 and Mr. Cobb stated that he consents to being on notice of information Defendants’ counsel 25 sends to the email address provided. Mr. Arlen St. Clair shall also ensure that his mailing 26 address is updated with the Clerk of Court as soon as possible. 27 28 3) By September 8, 2011, Defendants’ counsel shall review the proposed protective order provided by Plaintiffs at the hearing and thereafter file as one document: 1 a) Plaintiffs’ proposed protective order; 2 b) Any objections to Plaintiffs’ proposed order; and 3 c) Defendants’ proposed protective order, which was previously served on Plaintiffs. 4 4) Upon receipt and review of the parties’ proposed protective orders, the Court shall issue a 5 protective order which binds all parties in this matter. Failure to abide by the terms of the 6 protective order may result in the imposition of sanctions. 7 5) By September 8, 2011, Defendants’ counsel shall file as one document the parties’ proposed 8 orders for Wells Fargo and Chase Bank records. Upon issuance of the protective order, the 9 Court shall also issue an order directing Wells Fargo and Chase to produce the requested Defendants. 12 For the Northern District of California bank records. The cost of production shall be split evenly between Plaintiffs and 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 Dated: September 1, 2011 _______________________________ Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 JONATHAN D COBB SR Case Number: 10-03907 MEJ 6 Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 7 8 9 v. ERNEST BREDE Defendant. / 10 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on September 1, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Jonathan D. Cobb, Sr. 828 Weeks St. Palo Alto, CA 94303 Walter Arlen St. Clair 1227 Sevier St Menlo Park, CA 94025 19 20 21 Dated: September 1, 2011 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Brenda Tolbert, Deputy Clerk 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?