Badella et al v. Deniro Marketing, LLC et al
Filing
68
ORDER granting re 63 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Motion for Certification filed by Robert Badella, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 63 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Motion for Certification.(Certification) Hearing set for 1 0/21/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Motions due by 9/23/2011. Opposition due by 10/7/2011 Reply due by 10/14/2011.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/14/11. (fj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2011)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
)
ROBERT BADELLA, individually and on behalf )
of all persons similarly situated, et al.,
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
DENIRO MARKETING, LLC,
)
a California limited liability company, et al.
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
________________________________________ )
Case No. 3:10-cv-03908CRB
Hon. Charles R. Breyer
[PROPOSED] ORDER
GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
PURSUANT TO LOCAL
RULE 6-3 TOENLARGE
THE TIME FOR
CERTIFICATION
14
Plaintiffs Robert Badella, Robert Langford, Michael Shane York and Robert
15
16
W. Jeffries having moved the Court pursuant to Local Rule 6-3 to enlarge the time
17
for certification, supported by the Declaration of Richard Garbarini is hereby
18
GRANTED. Based on the parties voluntary consent to prior mediation and joint
19
letter notifying the Court of the parties’ intention to mediate, with the possibility of
20
amending the Court’s schedule in case mediation failed, the Court finds its
21
certification schedule cannot reasonably be met, and Plaintiffs have shown good
22
23
24
25
26
cause to enlarge the time for certification.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR CERTIFCATION
1
1
The amended schedule for Certification shall be as follows:
2
Plaintiffs’ Moving Brief is due on or before September 23, 2011;
3
Defendants’ Opposition Brief is due on or before October 7, 2011; and,
4
Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief is due on or before October 14, 2011.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
Dated: September 14, 2011
__________________________
11
ED
___________________________________
ORDER
T IS SO
I
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
harles
Judge C
NO
12
UNIT
ED
10
RT
13
RT
U
O
9
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
ER
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR CERTIFCATION
1
er
R. Brey
A
H
14
R NIA
8
There will be no further amendments to the certification schedule.
FO
7
October 21, 2011
Hearing on certification to be held on _______________.
LI
6
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?