Mendia v. Garcia

Filing 108

ORDER SCHEDULING CMC: Case Management Statement due by 3/10/2016. Case Management Conference set for 3/17/2016 10:00 AM. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel 105 is denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 2/26/2016. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2016)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 BERNARDO MENDIA, Case No. 10-cv-03910-MEJ Plaintiff, 5 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. 6 7 JOHN M. GARCIA, et al., Defendants. 8 9 10 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) and United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Civil Local Rule 16-10, a Case Management Conference will be held in this case before the 12 Honorable Maria-Elena James on March 17, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 450 13 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102. This conference shall be attended by lead trial 14 counsel for parties who are represented. Parties who are proceeding without counsel must appear 15 personally. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than seven calendar days before the Case Management Conference, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement containing the information in the Standing Order for All Judges in the Northern District of California, available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/mejorders. The Joint Case Management Statement form may be obtained at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. As matters raised in Plaintiff’s motion to compel Defendants to participate in a Rule 26(f) discovery planning conference (Dkt. No. 105) shall be addressed at the Case Management Conference, Plaintiff’s motion is denied without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 26, 2016 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?