Khazaeli v. City of Concord et al

Filing 94

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 28, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/28/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (wsn, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Khazaeli v. City of Concord et al Doc. 94 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 HAMIDREZAZ KHAZAELI, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CONCORD, KERRY CERLETTI, DAVID LIVINGSTON, DAVID HUGHES, PATRICK MURRAY, SHAHRIAR SHARIFI KHOU, a/k/a SHAWN SHARIFI, Defendants. / Defendant Shawn Sharifi filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint and noticed the hearing for April 14, 2011 (Dkt. No. 83). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, any brief in opposition to defendant's motion was due on March 24, 2011, but no such opposition has been received. Plaintiff Hamidrezaz Khazaeli is ordered to respond by APRIL 15, 2011, and show cause for his failure to respond to the motion in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3. This order to show cause does not constitute permission to file a late opposition to the motion. The hearing on April 14, 2011, is VACATED. A new hearing shall be noticed by the Court if necessary. If plaintiff does not respond by April 15, 2011, this case will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 28, 2011. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE No. C 10-03920 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?