Center for Sierra Nevada Conservation et al v. California Department of Parks and Recreation et al

Filing 12

ORDER DISMISSING FEDERAL DEFENDANTS; REMANDING CASE.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 9/22/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2010)

Download PDF
Center for Sierra Nevada Conservation et al v. California Department of Parks and Recreation et al Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Michael R. Lozeau (CA 142893) Richard T. Drury (CA 163559) Christina Caro (CA 250797) Lozeau | Drury LLP 401 12th Street, Suite 250 Oakland, CA 94607 Tel: (510) 836-4200\Fax: (510) 836-4205 richard@lozeaudrury.com Attorneys for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR SIERRA NEVADA CONSERVATION, a non-profit corporation; CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, a non-profit corporation, Plaintiffs, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION, an agency of the State of California; DIVISION OF OFFHIGHWAY MOTOR VEHICLE RECREATION, a division of the California Department of Parks and Recreation, Respondents and Defendants. ELDORADO NATIONAL FOREST; UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture; and RAMIRO VILLALVAZO, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Eldorado National Forest; and DOES I ­ X, inclusive, Real Parties in Interest and Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:10-CV-3923-MEJ [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING FEDERAL DEFENDANTS AND REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING FEDERAL DEFENDANTS AND REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT Case No. 3:10-CV-3923-MEJ Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 All Federal Defendants, (the Eldorado National Forest ("ENF"), United States Forest Service ("USFS"), Ramiro Villalvazo, and Does I-X), are hereby DISMISSED from this suit. There being no further basis for this Court to retain jurisdiction, this case is hereby remanded back to state court. Each party shall bear its own costs related to this removal and remand. IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED September 22 Dated _________________, 2010. S S DISTRICT TE C TA United States District Court Judge na Jame s Ju ER N F D IS T IC T O R [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING FEDERAL DEFENDANTS AND REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT Case No. 3:10-CV-3923-MEJ A C LI FO ria-Ele dge Ma R NIA RT U O . NO RT H Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?