Turner v. County of Alameda et al
Filing
28
ORDER DISMISSING CASE, STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 Stipulation filed by Michael Gallardo, County of Alameda, Samantha Marie Turner, Gregory J. Ahern. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge MARIA-ELENA JAMES on 1/4/12. (bjtS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2012)
1
2
3
4
JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq./ State Bar # 69888
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, CA 94621
Telephone: (510) 839-5200
Facsimile: (510) 839-3882
E-Mail: John.burris@johnburrislaw.com
5
6
7
8
GAYLA B. LIBET, Esq./ State Bar # 109173
LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET
486 41st Street, Suite 3
Oakland, CA 94609
Telephone and Facsimile: (510) 420-0324
E-Mail: Glibet@sbcglobal.net
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MICHAEL C. WENZEL, Esq./ State Bar # 215388
BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT
2749 Hyde Street
San Francisco, CA 94109
Telephone: (415) 353-0999
Facsimile: (415) 353-0990
E-Mail: Mwenzel@bfesf.com
Attorneys for Defendants
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
SAMANTHA MARIE TURNER, by and
through her guardian ad litem, DIANA LYNN
TURNER,
Plaintiff,
Case No. C10-03927 MEJ
STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
v.
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, a governmental
entity; GREGORY J. AHERN; in his capacity
as Sherifff for COUNTY OF ALAMEDA;
MICHAEL GALLARDO, individually, and in
his capacity as a deputy sheriff for COUNTY
OF ALAMEDA; and, DOES 1-25,inclusive,
Defendants.
28
1
STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
STIPULATION
1
2
TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD:
3
Plaintiff SAMANTHA MARIE TURNER, by and through her attorneys of record, and
4
defendants COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, SHERIFF GREGORY AHERN and DEPUTY SHERIFF
5
MICHAEL GALLARDO, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to dismissal of this
6
action with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs.
7
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
8
Respectfully submitted,
9
LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET
10
Dated: 01-04-12
11
By: /s/ Gayla B. Libet, Esq.
Gayla B. Libet, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
12
13
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
14
15
Dated: 01-04-12
16
By: /s/ John L. Burris, Esq.
John L. Burris, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
17
18
BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT
19
Dated: 01-04-12
20
21
By: /s/ Michael C. Wenzel, Esq.
Michael C. Wenzel, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendants
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
ORDER
1
2
3
4
The Court, having read and considered the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing,
dismisses this action with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
January 4, 2012
DATED: ________________
__________________________________
HONORABLE MARIA-ELENA JAMES
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?