Yates v. Auto City 76 et al
Filing
96
ORDER that Plaintiff, Craig Yates be excused from physically attending the Settlement Conference set for 11/4/2014 at 11:00 AM, but that he participate telephonically re 95 Letter filed by Craig Yates. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 10/30/14. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2014)
4
THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)
THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
4328 Redwood Hwy., Suite 300
San Rafael, CA 94903
Telephone: 415/444-5800
Facsimile:
415/444-5805
5
Attorney for Plaintiff CRAIG YATES
1
2
3
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
15
16
17
18
19
20
GOOD CAUSE being shown in the Declaration of Plaintiff CRAIG YATES to be
excused from physically being present at the Settlement Conference set for November 4, 2014
at 11:00 a.m. in the above captioned case, as he is still under home care and had not been
released by his Doctor.
21
ORDER
22
24
Settlement Conference set for November 4, 2014 at 11:00 a.m., but that he participate
25
. Ryu
By: ___________________________
onna M
Judge D
Honorable Magistrate Donna M. Ryu
ER
C
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
N
OF
D
H
28
October 30, 2014
RT
27
Dated:
TED
GRAN
NO
26
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
telephonically.
UNIT
ED
23
It is Ordered that Plaintiff, CRAIG YATES be excused from physically attending the
R NIA
14
FO
13
[PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXCUSE PLAINTIFF CRAIG YATES
FROM PHYSICALLY ATTENDING
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ON
NOVEMBER 4, 2014
LI
12
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
AUTO CITY 76; R.A.T. OIL, INC., a
)
California Corporation; and CANADIAN )
AMERICAN OIL COMPANY, a
)
California Corporation,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________ )
A
11
CASE NO. CV-10-3932- EMC (DMR)
CRAIG YATES,
S
10
IS T RIC T
[PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXCUSE PLAINTIFF CRAIG YATES FROM PHYSICALLY ATTENDING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. CV-10-3932- EMC (DMR)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?