Ditto et al v. JPMorgan Chase N.A. et al

Filing 24

ORDER CONTINUING BRIEFING AND HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re 22 Response filed by JPMorgan Chase N.A., California Reconveyance, 21 Response to Order to Show Cause filed by Frank Ditto, 23 Request for Judicial Notice, filed by JPMorgan Chase N.A., California Reconveyance. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 3, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2010)

Download PDF
Ditto et al v. JPMorgan Chase N.A. et al Doc. 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FRANK DITTO and JULIE DITTO, husband and wife, Plaintiffs, v. JP MORGAN CHASE N.A., LONG BEACH MORTGAGE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE, and DOES 110, Defendants. / No. C 10-03979 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER CONTINUING BRIEFING AND HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE The parties' submissions in response to the order to show cause for failure to respond to defendants' motion to dismiss are acknowledged. Good cause having been shown, plaintiffs' counsel is granted a limited extension of two weeks to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss. No further extensions will be granted. Plaintiffs' opposition to the motion is now due on DECEMBER 9, 2010. Any reply in support of the motion is now due on DECEMBER 16, 2010. The hearing on the motion currently set for December 16, 2010 is continued to DECEMBER 30, 2010. Defendants' request for judicial notice is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 3, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?