Ditto et al v. JPMorgan Chase N.A. et al
Filing
44
ORDER SETTING HEARING REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE Discovery Hearing set for 6/6/2011 before Hon. William Alsup. Signed by Judge Alsup on May 26, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
No. C 10-03979 WHA
FRANK DITTO,
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER SETTING HEARING
REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE
LONG BEACH MORTGAGE COMPANY
and CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE,
Defendants.
/
18
19
Defendant California Reconveyance Company has filed a motion to compel responses to
20
request for production of documents and special interrogatories. Defendant has ignored the
21
Court’s standing order regarding discovery disputes (Dkt. No. 17 at ¶ 25).
22
This order requires the parties to meet and confer in the Court’s jury room beginning from
23
11:00 A.M. and continuing through 2:00 P.M. on MONDAY, JUNE 6, 2011, concerning the
24
discovery dispute that is the subject of defendant’s motion. At 2:00 p.m., the Court shall hold a
25
hearing to resolve any remaining issues. Plaintiff’s response to defendant’s submission is due by
26
27
28
NOON ON JUNE 2, 2011.
The motion hearing noticed for June 30 is VACATED.
1
2
Please note that only those lawyers who personally attend the meet-and-confer in the
Court’s jury room may argue at the hearing.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: May 26, 2011.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?