Ditto et al v. JPMorgan Chase N.A. et al

Filing 8

SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/1/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2010)

Download PDF
Ditto et al v. JPMorgan Chase N.A. et al Doc. 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California FRANK DITTO and JULIE DITTO, v. Plaintiffs, No. C 10-03979 MEJ SEOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION FORM JP MORGAN CHASE N.A., et al., Defendants. _____________________________________/ On October 20, 2010, the Court ordered the parties to file a consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction or a request for reassignment to a district judge by October 28, 2010. (Dkt. #5.) Plaintiffs have failed to comply with this order. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the magistrate judges of this district court are designated to conduct any and all proceedings in a civil case, including trial and entry of final judgment, upon the consent of the parties. . You have the right to have your case assigned to a United States District Judge for trial and disposition. Accordingly, Plaintiffs shall inform the Court whether they consent to Magistrate Judge James' jurisdiction or request reassignment to a United States District Judge for trial. A copy of both the consent and declination forms may be obtained from the Northern District of California's website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/. From the homepage, click on the "Forms" tab on the left margin, then choose "Civil." Plaintiffs shall inform the Court of their decision by November 8, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 1, 2010 _______________________________ Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?