James v. Puga et al
ORDER (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2011)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DENNIS LAMAR JAMES, JR.,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
No. C 10-4009 SI (pr)
HAYWARD POLICE DEPARTMENT;
Plaintiff's second motion for appointment of counsel (docket # 11) is DENIED for the
same reasons his first motion for appointment of counsel was denied at page 5 of the order of
dismissal with leave to amend.
Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file his amended complaint is GRANTED.
(Docket # 10.) Plaintiff must file his amended complaint no later than June 10, 2011. No
further extensions of this deadline will be granted because it already has been extended twice
and, by the time the newly-extended deadline arrives, he will have had almost six months to
prepare his amended complaint. If the amended complaint is not filed by the deadline, this
action will be dismissed.
No later than June 1, 2011, plaintiff must show cause why this action should not be
dismissed for his failure to pay the partial filing fee that was imposed in the order of dismissal
with leave to amend.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 5, 2011
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?