James v. Puga et al

Filing 12

ORDER (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2011)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

DENNIS LAMAR JAMES, JR.,

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13

No. C 10-4009 SI (pr)

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
HAYWARD POLICE DEPARTMENT;
et al.;
Defendants.
/

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiff's second motion for appointment of counsel (docket # 11) is DENIED for the
same reasons his first motion for appointment of counsel was denied at page 5 of the order of
dismissal with leave to amend.
Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file his amended complaint is GRANTED.
(Docket # 10.) Plaintiff must file his amended complaint no later than June 10, 2011. No
further extensions of this deadline will be granted because it already has been extended twice
and, by the time the newly-extended deadline arrives, he will have had almost six months to
prepare his amended complaint. If the amended complaint is not filed by the deadline, this
action will be dismissed.
No later than June 1, 2011, plaintiff must show cause why this action should not be
dismissed for his failure to pay the partial filing fee that was imposed in the order of dismissal
with leave to amend.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 5, 2011

_______________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge