International Business Machines Corporation v. Rambus Inc
Filing
44
ORDER GRANTING 43 Stipulation Re: Case Schedule. CROSS-DISPOSITIVE Motion Hearing set for 9/23/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 4/15/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Barbara Clarke McCurdy (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com
Naveen Modi (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
naveen.modi@finnegan.com
Srikala P. Atluri (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
srikala.atluri@finnegan.com
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
901 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
Telephone:
(202) 408-4000
Facsimile:
(202) 408-4400
7
8
9
10
11
12
Tina E. Hulse (CA Bar No. 232936)
tina.hulse@finnegan.com
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304-1203
Telephone:
(650) 849-6600
Facsimile:
(650) 849-6666
Attorneys for Defendant
Rambus Inc.
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
MACHINES CORPORATION,
CASE NO. C 10-04017-JSW
(Related Case: C 10-03736-JSW)
19
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION RE: CASE SCHEDULE;
20
v.
SUPPORTING DECLARATION OF TINA E.
HULSE;
21
RAMBUS INC.,
22
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
CASE SCHEDULE
CASE NO. C 10-04017-JSW
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff International Business Machines
2
Corporation (“IBM”) and Defendant Rambus Inc. (“Rambus”), through their respective counsel of
3
record, respectfully request, and with the Court’s permission, stipulate to a four-week extension of
4
the current case schedule to allow the parties to effectively discuss settlement. More specifically,
5
with the Court’s permission, the parties hereby stipulate that the current schedule set forth in the
6
January 18, 2011, Civil Minute Order [Dkt. 38] be modified as follows:
7
8
9
EVENT
CURRENT SCHEDULE
PROPOSED DATE
Rambus shall file opening
summary judgment motion
June 24, 2011
July 22, 2011
IBM shall file opposition and
cross-motion for summary
judgment
July 8, 2011
August 5, 2011
Rambus shall file reply and
opposition to cross-motion for
summary judgment
July 22, 2011
August 19, 2011
IBM shall file reply in support
of cross-motion for summary
judgment
July 29, 2011
August 26, 2011
Hearing on Cross-Dispositive
Motions
August 26, 2011
September 23, 2011, or any
later date, subject to the
convenience of the Court’s
calendar
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
By her signature below, counsel for Defendant attests that counsel for Plaintiff concurs in the
filing of this stipulation.
22
Respectfully submitted,
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: April 14, 2011
By:
/s/ Edward A. Kmett
Edward A. Kmett (SBN: 204374)
FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO
650 Town Center Drive, Suite 1600
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Telephone: (714) 540-8700
Facsimile: (714) 540-9823
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
International Business Machines Corporation
-1-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
CASE SCHEDULE
CASE NO. C 10-04017-JSW
1
Date: April 14, 2011
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
By:
/s/ Tina E. Hulse
Tina E. Hulse (CA Bar No. 232936)
tina.hulse@finnegan.com
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304-1203
Telephone:(650) 849-6600
Facsimile: (650) 849-6666
Barbara Clarke McCurdy (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com
Naveen Modi (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
naveen.modi@finnegan.com
Srikala P. Atluri (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
srikala.atluri@finnegan.com
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
901 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
Telephone:(202) 408-4000
Facsimile: (202) 408-4400
14
15
Attorneys for Defendant,
Rambus Inc.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
CASE SCHEDULE
CASE NO. C 10-04017-JSW
1
2
3
SUPPORTING DECLARATION OF TINA E. HULSE
I, TINA E. HULSE, declare as follows:
1. I am an associate at Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., counsel
4
for Defendant Rambus Inc. (“Rambus”). I submit this declaration in support of the parties’
5
Stipulation Regarding Case Schedule. I make this declaration of my own personal knowledge and
6
will competently testify thereto if called upon to do so.
7
2. On January 18, 2011, the Court entered a Civil Minute Order (“Order”) [Dkt. 38]
8
following the initial Case Management Conference. The Order set forth a briefing schedule for
9
cross-motions for summary judgment. The Order also set the hearing on cross-dispositive motions
10
11
for August 26, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.
3. The parties, both the respective corporate representatives and outside counsel, have been
12
actively discussing resolution of this case. Accordingly, the parties have met and conferred and
13
agree that continuing the case schedule for four weeks will facilitate these settlement discussions.
14
4. There have been no previous time modifications of the case schedule set forth in the
15
Order. Otherwise, the only time modification in this case was to change the Case Management
16
Conference from December 3, 2010, to January 14, 2011, to coincide with the hearing on Rambus’s
17
motion to dismiss. See Dkt. 30.
18
19
20
21
5. The requested modification in the current case schedule will not affect any other pre-trial
deadlines, as the pre-trial schedule has not yet been entered in this case.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
true and correct, and this declaration was executed this 14th day of April, 2011.
22
/s/ Tina E. Hulse
Tina E. Hulse
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
CASE SCHEDULE
CASE NO. C 10-04017-JSW
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
Dated: April 15 2011
__,
5
The Honorable Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge
Northern District of California
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
CASE SCHEDULE
CASE NO. C 10-04017-JSW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?