International Business Machines Corporation v. Rambus Inc

Filing 49

ORDER GRANTING 47 Stipulation Re: Case Schedule. Motion Hearing set for 10/21/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 6/1/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:10-cv-04017-JSW Document47 1 2 3 4 5 6 Filed05/27/11 Page1 of 5 Barbara Clarke McCurdy (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com Naveen Modi (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) naveen.modi@finnegan.com Srikala P. Atluri (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) srikala.atluri@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 901 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 Telephone: (202) 408-4000 Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 7 8 9 10 11 12 Tina E. Hulse (CA Bar No. 232936) tina.hulse@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 3300 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, California 94304-1203 Telephone: (650) 849-6600 Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 Attorneys for Defendant Rambus Inc. 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, CASE NO. C 10-04017-JSW (Related Case: C 10-03736-JSW) 19 Plaintiff, STIPULATION RE: CASE SCHEDULE; 20 v. SUPPORTING DECLARATION OF TINA E. HULSE; 21 RAMBUS INC., 22 [PROPOSED] ORDER Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CASE SCHEDULE CASE NO. C 10-04017-JSW Case3:10-cv-04017-JSW Document47 1 Filed05/27/11 Page2 of 5 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff International Business Machines 2 Corporation (“IBM”) and Defendant Rambus Inc. (“Rambus”), through their respective counsel of 3 record, respectfully request, and with the Court’s permission, stipulate to a two-week extension of 4 the current case schedule to allow the parties to finalize the settlement agreement and associated 5 papers. The parties note that they have exchanged drafts and are currently working on finalizing the 6 papers. More specifically, with the Court’s permission, the parties hereby stipulate that the current 7 schedule set forth in the May 12, 2011, Stipulated Order [Dkt. 46] be modified as follows: 8 9 10 EVENT CURRENT SCHEDULE PROPOSED DATE Rambus shall file opening summary judgment motion August 5, 2011 August 19, 2011 IBM shall file opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment August 19, 2011 September 2, 2011 Rambus shall file reply and opposition to cross-motion for summary judgment September 2, 2011 September 16, 2011 IBM shall file reply in support of cross-motion for summary judgment September 9, 2011 September 23, 2011 Hearing on Cross-Dispositive Motions October 7, 2011 October 21, 2011, or any later date, subject to the convenience of the Court’s calendar 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 By her signature below, counsel for Defendant attests that counsel for Plaintiff concurs in the filing of this stipulation. Respectfully submitted, 24 25 26 Date: May 27, 2011 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 27 28 By: /s/ Tina E. Hulse Tina E. Hulse (CA Bar No. 232936) -1- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CASE SCHEDULE CASE NO. C 10-04017-JSW Case3:10-cv-04017-JSW Document47 1 Filed05/27/11 Page3 of 5 tina.hulse@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 3300 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, California 94304-1203 Telephone:(650) 849-6600 Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 2 3 4 5 Barbara Clarke McCurdy (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com Naveen Modi (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) naveen.modi@finnegan.com Srikala P. Atluri (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) srikala.atluri@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 901 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 Telephone:(202) 408-4000 Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 6 7 8 9 10 11 Attorneys for Defendant, Rambus Inc. 12 13 Dated: May 27, 2011 14 15 16 By: /s/ Edward A. Kmett Edward A. Kmett (SBN: 204374) FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO 650 Town Center Drive, Suite 1600 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Telephone: (714) 540-8700 Facsimile: (714) 540-9823 17 18 Attorneys for Plaintiff, International Business Machines Corporation 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CASE SCHEDULE CASE NO. C 10-04017-JSW Case3:10-cv-04017-JSW Document47 1 2 Filed05/27/11 Page4 of 5 SUPPORTING DECLARATION OF TINA E. HULSE I, TINA E. HULSE, declare as follows: 3 1. I am an associate at Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., counsel 4 for Defendant Rambus Inc. (“Rambus”). I submit this declaration in support of the parties’ 5 Stipulation Regarding Case Schedule. I make this declaration of my own personal knowledge and 6 will competently testify thereto if called upon to do so. 7 2. On April 15, 2011, and May 12, 2011, the Court entered Stipulated Orders [Dkt. Nos. 44 8 and 46], which set forth a briefing schedule for cross-motions for summary judgment. The May 12, 9 2011, Stipulated Order [Dkt 46] also set the hearing on cross-dispositive motions for October 7, 10 2011, or any later date, subject to the convenience of the Court’s calendar. 11 3. The parties, both the respective corporate representatives and outside counsel, have been 12 actively discussing resolution of this case, have reached a settlement in principle, and have 13 exchanged drafts of the settlement papers and are currently working on finalizing them. 14 Accordingly, the parties have met and conferred and agree that continuing the case schedule for two 15 weeks will facilitate finalization of the necessary settlement papers precedent to resolution of this 16 action. 17 4. The Court previously granted the Stipulated Orders to permit settlement discussions. 18 Otherwise, the only time modification in this case was to change the Case Management Conference 19 from December 3, 2010, to January 14, 2011, to coincide with the hearing on Rambus’s motion to 20 dismiss. See Dkt. 30. 21 22 23 24 5. The requested modification in the current case schedule will not affect any other pre-trial deadlines, as the pre-trial schedule has not yet been entered in this case. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct, and this declaration was executed this 27th day of May, 2011. 25 /s/ Tina E. Hulse Tina E. Hulse 26 27 28 -3- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CASE SCHEDULE CASE NO. C 10-04017-JSW Case3:10-cv-04017-JSW Document47 1 2 Filed05/27/11 Page5 of 5 [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 June 1 Dated: May __, 2011 5 The Honorable Jeffrey S. White United States District Judge Northern District of California 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CASE SCHEDULE CASE NO. C 10-04017-JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?