International Business Machines Corporation v. Rambus Inc
Filing
49
ORDER GRANTING 47 Stipulation Re: Case Schedule. Motion Hearing set for 10/21/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 6/1/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2011)
Case3:10-cv-04017-JSW Document47
1
2
3
4
5
6
Filed05/27/11 Page1 of 5
Barbara Clarke McCurdy (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com
Naveen Modi (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
naveen.modi@finnegan.com
Srikala P. Atluri (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
srikala.atluri@finnegan.com
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
901 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
Telephone:
(202) 408-4000
Facsimile:
(202) 408-4400
7
8
9
10
11
12
Tina E. Hulse (CA Bar No. 232936)
tina.hulse@finnegan.com
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304-1203
Telephone:
(650) 849-6600
Facsimile:
(650) 849-6666
Attorneys for Defendant
Rambus Inc.
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
MACHINES CORPORATION,
CASE NO. C 10-04017-JSW
(Related Case: C 10-03736-JSW)
19
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION RE: CASE SCHEDULE;
20
v.
SUPPORTING DECLARATION OF TINA E.
HULSE;
21
RAMBUS INC.,
22
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
CASE SCHEDULE
CASE NO. C 10-04017-JSW
Case3:10-cv-04017-JSW Document47
1
Filed05/27/11 Page2 of 5
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff International Business Machines
2
Corporation (“IBM”) and Defendant Rambus Inc. (“Rambus”), through their respective counsel of
3
record, respectfully request, and with the Court’s permission, stipulate to a two-week extension of
4
the current case schedule to allow the parties to finalize the settlement agreement and associated
5
papers. The parties note that they have exchanged drafts and are currently working on finalizing the
6
papers. More specifically, with the Court’s permission, the parties hereby stipulate that the current
7
schedule set forth in the May 12, 2011, Stipulated Order [Dkt. 46] be modified as follows:
8
9
10
EVENT
CURRENT SCHEDULE
PROPOSED DATE
Rambus shall file opening
summary judgment motion
August 5, 2011
August 19, 2011
IBM shall file opposition and
cross-motion for summary
judgment
August 19, 2011
September 2, 2011
Rambus shall file reply and
opposition to cross-motion for
summary judgment
September 2, 2011
September 16, 2011
IBM shall file reply in support
of cross-motion for summary
judgment
September 9, 2011
September 23, 2011
Hearing on Cross-Dispositive
Motions
October 7, 2011
October 21, 2011, or any
later date, subject to the
convenience of the Court’s
calendar
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
By her signature below, counsel for Defendant attests that counsel for Plaintiff concurs in the
filing of this stipulation.
Respectfully submitted,
24
25
26
Date: May 27, 2011
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
27
28
By:
/s/ Tina E. Hulse
Tina E. Hulse (CA Bar No. 232936)
-1-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
CASE SCHEDULE
CASE NO. C 10-04017-JSW
Case3:10-cv-04017-JSW Document47
1
Filed05/27/11 Page3 of 5
tina.hulse@finnegan.com
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304-1203
Telephone:(650) 849-6600
Facsimile: (650) 849-6666
2
3
4
5
Barbara Clarke McCurdy (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com
Naveen Modi (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
naveen.modi@finnegan.com
Srikala P. Atluri (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
srikala.atluri@finnegan.com
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
901 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
Telephone:(202) 408-4000
Facsimile: (202) 408-4400
6
7
8
9
10
11
Attorneys for Defendant,
Rambus Inc.
12
13
Dated: May 27, 2011
14
15
16
By:
/s/ Edward A. Kmett
Edward A. Kmett (SBN: 204374)
FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO
650 Town Center Drive, Suite 1600
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Telephone: (714) 540-8700
Facsimile: (714) 540-9823
17
18
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
International Business Machines Corporation
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
CASE SCHEDULE
CASE NO. C 10-04017-JSW
Case3:10-cv-04017-JSW Document47
1
2
Filed05/27/11 Page4 of 5
SUPPORTING DECLARATION OF TINA E. HULSE
I, TINA E. HULSE, declare as follows:
3
1. I am an associate at Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., counsel
4
for Defendant Rambus Inc. (“Rambus”). I submit this declaration in support of the parties’
5
Stipulation Regarding Case Schedule. I make this declaration of my own personal knowledge and
6
will competently testify thereto if called upon to do so.
7
2. On April 15, 2011, and May 12, 2011, the Court entered Stipulated Orders [Dkt. Nos. 44
8
and 46], which set forth a briefing schedule for cross-motions for summary judgment. The May 12,
9
2011, Stipulated Order [Dkt 46] also set the hearing on cross-dispositive motions for October 7,
10
2011, or any later date, subject to the convenience of the Court’s calendar.
11
3. The parties, both the respective corporate representatives and outside counsel, have been
12
actively discussing resolution of this case, have reached a settlement in principle, and have
13
exchanged drafts of the settlement papers and are currently working on finalizing them.
14
Accordingly, the parties have met and conferred and agree that continuing the case schedule for two
15
weeks will facilitate finalization of the necessary settlement papers precedent to resolution of this
16
action.
17
4. The Court previously granted the Stipulated Orders to permit settlement discussions.
18
Otherwise, the only time modification in this case was to change the Case Management Conference
19
from December 3, 2010, to January 14, 2011, to coincide with the hearing on Rambus’s motion to
20
dismiss. See Dkt. 30.
21
22
23
24
5. The requested modification in the current case schedule will not affect any other pre-trial
deadlines, as the pre-trial schedule has not yet been entered in this case.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
true and correct, and this declaration was executed this 27th day of May, 2011.
25
/s/ Tina E. Hulse
Tina E. Hulse
26
27
28
-3-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
CASE SCHEDULE
CASE NO. C 10-04017-JSW
Case3:10-cv-04017-JSW Document47
1
2
Filed05/27/11 Page5 of 5
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
June 1
Dated: May __, 2011
5
The Honorable Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge
Northern District of California
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
CASE SCHEDULE
CASE NO. C 10-04017-JSW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?