Nguyen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 43

ORDER by Judge Laporte denying 42 Motion for Reconsideration filed by Tony Phat Ngoc Nguyen (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2010)

Nguyen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Doc. 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al., Defendants. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TONY PHAT NGOC NGUYEN, Plaintiff,

No. C-10-4081-EDL ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

On November 1, 2010, Plaintiff filed a "Motion for Leave To File A Motion For Reconsideration" pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-9(b)(3). This rule requires the moving party to "specifically show . . . [a] manifest failure by the Court to consider material facts or dispositive legal arguments which were presented to the Court before such interlocutory order." Plaintiff's motion points to two statements in the Court's order denying remand and granting Defendants' motion to dismiss, but does not attempt to explain, let alone "specifically show," how these statements are erroneous or any failure of the Court to consider previously-presented facts or legal arguments. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion fails to meet the requirements of Civil Local Rule 7-9(b)(3) and the motion is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 2, 2010 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge

Dockets.Justia.com