Wu v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al

Filing 32

ORDER GRANTING 31 Stipulation Continuing Pretrial Deadlines Based on Conditional Settlement. Case Management Statement due by 2/24/2012. Case Management Conference set for 3/2/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 10/11/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:10-cv-04085-JSW Document31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Filed10/07/11 Page1 of 3 GREGORY P. O'HARA (SBN 131963) gohara@nixonpeabody.com ANDREW R. NEILSON (SBN 221694) aneilson@nixonpeabody.com GINA M. FORNARIO (SBN 246619) gfornario@nixonpeabody.com NIXON PEABODY LLP One Embarcadero Center, 18th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3600 Telephone: (415) 984-8200 Fax: (415) 984-8300 Attorneys for Defendant FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER OF UNITED COMMERCIAL BANK 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 15 THOMAS S. WU, Plaintiff, 16 17 18 19 20 21 Case No. CV10-4085 JSW STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING PRETRIAL DEADLINES BASED ON CONDITIONAL SETTLEMENT vs. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, in its capacity as receiver of United Commercial Bank, and FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, in its corporate capacity, Defendants. 22 23 24 STIPULATION This case arises out of the failure of United Commercial Bank (“UCB”). On March 15-16, 25 2011, the above-captioned parties attended mediation with Hon. Daniel Weinstein (Ret.). The 26 mediation included participants and issues from several legal actions, including Thomas Wu’s claims 27 against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in its capacity as receiver of UCB (the “FDIC”) 28 1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Case No. Case No. CV10-4085 JSW 13639107.1 Case3:10-cv-04085-JSW Document31 Filed10/07/11 Page2 of 3 1 and the FDIC’s claims against Mr. Wu (together, “the Parties”). The terms of a conditional global 2 settlement were reached. However, given the number of participants and the complexity of the 3 issues, the parties are still negotiating the terms and conditions of a final agreement; 4 WHEREAS the Parties believe that it would promote efficiency and the conservation of the 5 Court’s and the Parties’ resources to continue pretrial deadlines while the Parties negotiate the terms 6 and conditions of a final agreement; 7 8 9 10 11 THEREFORE, the Parties, through their respective counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate that: 1. The FDIC’s responsive pleading deadline shall be continued from October 31, 2011, to February 1, 2012; and 2. The Case Management Conference and all attendant matters – including the filing of 12 the joint Case Management Statement and Rule 26(f) Report, and the serving of the parties’ initial 13 disclosures under Rule 26(a) – shall be continued until after February 1, 2012, on a date to be set by 14 the Court. 15 16 Dated: October 7, 2011 NIXON PEABODY LLP 17 18 By 19 Andrew Neilson Attorneys for Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as receiver of United Commercial Bank 20 21 22 /s/ Andrew Neilson Dated: October 7, 2011 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 23 24 By 25 /s/ Timothy Crudo Timothy P. Crudo Attorneys for Plaintiff Thomas S. Wu 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDE Case No. Case No. CV10-4085 JSW 13639107.1 Case3:10-cv-04085-JSW Document31 1 Filed10/07/11 Page3 of 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 October 31, 2011 The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for _______________, is hereby 3 March 2 continued to _______________, 2012. The parties shall meet and confer and file a Joint Case 4 Management Statement and exchange initial disclosures pursuant to FRCP 26(a) on or before 5 February 24 _______________, 2012. 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 Dated: October ____, 2011 11 ______________________________ Hon. Jeffrey S. White 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Case No. Case No. CV10-4085 JSW 13639107.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?