Wu v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
Filing
41
ORDER GRANTING 40 Stipulation and Proposed Order Continuing Pretrial Deadlines Based on Conditional Settlement. Case Management Statement due by 2/22/2013. Case Management Conference set for 3/1/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on October 29, 2012. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2012)
Case3:10-cv-04085-JSW Document40 Filed10/26/12 Page1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
GREGORY P. O'HARA (SBN 131963)
gohara@nixonpeabody.com
GINA M. FORNARIO (SBN 246619)
gfornario@nixonpeabody.com
NIXON PEABODY LLP
One Embarcadero Center, 18th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3600
Telephone: (415) 984-8200
Fax: (415) 984-8300
Attorneys for Defendant
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
AS RECEIVER OF UNITED COMMERCIAL BANK
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
14
THOMAS S. WU,
Plaintiff,
15
18
19
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CONTINUING PRETRIAL DEADLINES
BASED ON CONDITIONAL
SETTLEMENT
vs.
16
17
Case No. 3:10-cv-04085 JSW
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION, in its capacity as receiver of
United Commercial Bank, and FEDERAL
DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, in its
corporate capacity,
Defendants.
20
21
22
STIPULATION
23
This case arises out of the failure of United Commercial Bank (“UCB”). On March 15-16,
24
2011, the above-captioned parties attended mediation with Hon. Daniel Weinstein (Ret.). Since that
25
time, pretrial deadlines in this case have been extended several times in anticipation of a global
26
settlement involving the Parties to this matter, among others. After considerable negotiation, the
27
Parties finalized and executed the terms of a global settlement which was approved by the
28
1
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
Case No. Case No. 3:10-cv-04085 JSW
14190000.2
Case3:10-cv-04085-JSW Document40 Filed10/26/12 Page2 of 4
1
Bankruptcy Court on October 22, 2012, although a formal order has not yet been entered. At this
2
time, the schedules of the Parties and their counsel necessitate a further extension of pretrial
3
deadlines in order for the settlement to be completed.
4
5
WHEREAS the Parties believe that it would promote efficiency and the conservation of the
Court’s and the Parties’ resources to continue pretrial deadlines at this time;
6
7
THEREFORE, the Parties, through their respective counsel of record, hereby agree and
stipulate that:
8
9
1.
The FDIC’s responsive pleading deadline shall be continued from November 5,
2012, to February 1, 2013; and
10
2.
The Case Management Conference and all attendant matters – including the filing
11
of the joint Case Management Statement and Rule 26(f) Report, and the serving of the parties’ initial
12
disclosures under Rule 26(a) – shall be continued until after February 1, 2013, on a date to be set by
13
the Court.
14
15
Dated: October 26, 2012
NIXON PEABODY LLP
16
17
By
18
/s/ Gina M. Fornario
Gina M. Fornario
Attorneys for Defendant Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, as receiver of
United Commercial Bank
19
20
21
22
Dated: October 26, 2012
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
23
By
24
25
/s/ Timothy P. Crudo
Timothy P. Crudo
Attorneys for Plaintiff Thomas S. Wu
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
Case No. Case No. 3:10-cv-04085 JSW
14190000.2
Case3:10-cv-04085-JSW Document40 Filed10/26/12 Page3 of 4
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
The FDIC’s responsive pleading deadline shall be continued from November 5, 2012, to
3
February 1, 2013. The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for November 16, 2012, is
4
March 1
hereby continued to _______________, 2013. The parties shall meet and confer and file a Joint Case
5
Management Statement and exchange initial disclosures pursuant to FRCP 26(a) on or before
6
February 22
_______________, 2013.
7
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated:
October 29, 2012
10
______________________________
Hon. Jeffrey S. White
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
Case No. Case No. 3:10-cv-04085 JSW
14190000.2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?