Reimann et al v. Brachfeld et al

Filing 23

ORDER RE: 20 DENYING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CHANGE TIME ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/5/10. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2010)

Download PDF
Reimann et al v. Brachfeld et al Doc. 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 JUDITH REIMANN and MICHAEL DaRONCO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. ERICA L. BRACHFELD, THE BRACHFELD LAW GROUP, P.C., MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, LLC, and MIDLAND FUNDING NCC-2 CORP. and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendants. ___________________________________/ *E-Filed 11/5/10* IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION No. C 10-04156 RS ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CHANGE TIME ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the Northern District of California Plaintiffs Judith Reimann and Michael DaRonoco filed an administrative motion under Civil Local Rules 6-3 and 7-11 to change time on defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings from its currently scheduled date of December 2, 2010. Having considered the plaintiffs' motion and defendants' opposition, the motion is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 11/05/2010 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE RICHARD SEEBORG NO. C 10-04156 RS ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?