Dacer v. Estrada et al

Filing 35

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 33 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Michael Ray Aquino. Signed by Judge Alsup on October 14, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/14/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (wsn, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 7 8 Plaintiffs, 9 10 ORDER SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. 16 JOSEPH EJERCITO ESTRADA, individually and in his official capacity, PANFILO M. LACSON, individually and in his official capacity, REYNALDO “BUTCH” TENORIO, individually and in his official capacity, DANTE TAN, individually and in his official capacity, MICHAEL RAY AQUINO, individually and in his official capacity, VICENTE ARNADO, individually and in his official capacity, GLENN DUMLAO, individually and in his official capacity, and DOES 1–100, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court No. C 10-04165 WHA CARINA DACER, SABINA DACERREYES, AMPARO DACER-HENSON, and EMILY DACER-HUNGERFORD, 12 13 14 15 / 18 19 Defendant Michael Ray Aquino, who is in custody in the Philippines, has filed a motion 20 for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 33). The submission was post-marked October 4, and it was 21 received and placed on the docket on October 13 (Dkt. No. 33-1). To account for the length of 22 time required to mail documents to and from the Philippines, the motion will be briefed and heard 23 on the following schedule. Plaintiffs’ opposition is due on OCTOBER 27, 2011. Defendant 24 Aquino’s reply is due on DECEMBER 1, 2011. The motion will be heard at 8:00 A.M. ON 25 DECEMBER 15, 2011. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: October 14, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?