Dacer v. Estrada et al

Filing 45

ORDER RE FAILURE TO SHOW [re Set/Reset Hearings]. Counsel will please explain by 1/27/2012 why they failed to appear. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 1/20/2012. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 CARINA DACER, SABINA DACER-REYES, AMPARO DACER-HENSON, and EMILY DACER-HUNGERFORD, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiffs, v. JOSEPH EJERCITO ESTRADA, individually and in his official capacity, PANFILO M. LACSON, individually and in his official capacity, REYNALDO “BUTCH” TENORIO, individually and in his official capacity, DANTE TAN, individually and in his official capacity, MICHAEL RAY AQUINO, individually and in his official capacity, VICENTE ARNADO, individually and in his official capacity, GLENN DUMLAO, individually and in his official capacity, and DOES 1–100, inclusive, ORDER RE FAILURE TO SHOW Defendants. / 20 21 No. C 10-04165 WHA A case management conference was scheduled for today at 3:00 p.m. The case was called 22 at 3:15 p.m. and no one appeared. Counsel will please explain in a sworn declaration by 23 JANUARY 27, 2012, why they failed to appear. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 19, 2012. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?