Dacer v. Estrada et al
Filing
45
ORDER RE FAILURE TO SHOW [re Set/Reset Hearings]. Counsel will please explain by 1/27/2012 why they failed to appear. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 1/20/2012. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
CARINA DACER, SABINA DACER-REYES,
AMPARO DACER-HENSON, and EMILY
DACER-HUNGERFORD,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiffs,
v.
JOSEPH EJERCITO ESTRADA, individually
and in his official capacity, PANFILO M.
LACSON, individually and in his official capacity,
REYNALDO “BUTCH” TENORIO, individually
and in his official capacity, DANTE TAN,
individually and in his official capacity, MICHAEL
RAY AQUINO, individually and in his official
capacity, VICENTE ARNADO, individually
and in his official capacity, GLENN DUMLAO,
individually and in his official capacity, and
DOES 1–100, inclusive,
ORDER RE
FAILURE TO SHOW
Defendants.
/
20
21
No. C 10-04165 WHA
A case management conference was scheduled for today at 3:00 p.m. The case was called
22
at 3:15 p.m. and no one appeared. Counsel will please explain in a sworn declaration by
23
JANUARY 27, 2012, why they failed to appear.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 19, 2012.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?