Swain v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
Filing
22
ORDER regarding mediation and CMC re 21 Stipulation filed by Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/28/2011 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/3/2011. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
THE GRAVES FIRM
ALLEN GRAVES (SB# 204580)
E-mail: allen@gravesfirm.com
ELIZABETH SULLIVAN (SB# 212482)
E-mail: liz@gravesfirm.com
790 E. Colorado Blvd., 9th Floor
Pasadena, CA 91101
Telephone: (626) 240-0575
Facsimile: (626) 737-7013
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Jim Swain
8
9
10
11
Keith A. Jacoby (SB #150233)
LITTLER MENDELSON
A Professional Corporation
2049 Century Park East, 5th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3107
Email: kjacoby@littler.com
Telephone: 310.553-0308
Facsimile: 310.553.5583
Michelle B. Heverly (SB #178660)
Erica H. Kelley (SB # 221702)
LITTLER MENDELSON
50 W. San Fernando Street, 15th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Email: mheverly@littler.com
Email: ekelley@littler.com
Telephone: (408) 998-4150
Facsimile: (408) 288-5686
Attorneys for Defendant
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
Plaintiff,
17
18
19
20
21
CASE NO. 3:10-cv-04192-CRB
Jim Swain,
v.
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. and
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
MEDIATION AND CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
Pursuant to 28 USC §1447(C), the only parties that have appeared in this action,
2
Plaintiff Jim Swain (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
3
(“Defendant”), through their respective counsel, hereby jointly stipulate and request that
4
the Court change the date of the Case Management Conference in the above-captioned
5
matter from its current date of July 22, 2011 to October 28, 2011. The parties further
6
stipulate and request that the new Case Management Conference date be treated as the
7
initial Case Management Conference date for the purpose of calculating the deadline for
8
meetings between counsel, initial disclosures, and reports to the Court pursuant Rule 26.
9
10
11
12
13
14
This stipulation is made and entered into by the parties on the following basis:
1)
On February 22, 2011, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this Court
ordered that the parties complete a private mediation no later than July 18, 2011.
2)
Pursuant to this Court’s Order, the parties scheduled a mediation before
JAMS mediator Joel Grossman for June 17, 2011.
3)
This Court’s order of February 22 also required the parties to exchange
15
specific documents in advance of the mediation. Among the requirements was that
16
Defendant provide Plaintiff with a random sample of paper time records for members of
17
the putative class.
18
4)
Pursuant to the Court’s order of February 22, Plaintiff provided Defendant
19
with a list that specified a random sample of locations and time periods for which paper
20
records would be provided.
21
5)
After gathering approximately 50% of the requested records, Defendant
22
determined that the sample requested by Plaintiff would require the production of
23
approximately 28,000 paper records.
24
6)
To date, Defendant has produced nearly 14,000 pages of documents.
25
7)
The parties have agreed that a smaller sample should be used, and Plaintiff
26
has provided Defendant with a modified sample request. Defendant is currently in the
27
process of reviewing that modified request.
28
-1JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
8)
As a result of the sheer number of documents that have been produced and
2
the need to further modify the sample, the current mediation date of June 17, 2011 will not
3
provide sufficient time for Defendant to produce the remaining documents and allow the
4
parties to evaluate the data and prepare their positions before mediation.
5
9)
The parties contacted the mediator, Joel Grossman, and based on his
6
schedule and the schedule of the parties, the first available date to continue the mediation
7
is September 7, 2011, which the parties have already confirmed with Mr. Grossman.
8
9
10
10)
Defendant represents that as of this date, Defendant has not made any
payments pursuant to California Labor Code §226.7. On that basis, Plaintiff will
withdraw his Special Interrogatories 7 and 8.
11
11)
Defendant has been diligently gathering and reviewing documents that were
12
requested by Plaintiff in an attempt to meet the current deadlines, but given the number of
13
documents involved, the current mediation date of June 17, 2011 is simply impossible to
14
meet.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED:
The parties stipulate and respectfully request the Court order as follows: the
3
Case Management Conference in the above-captioned matter is hereby changed from its
4
current date of July 22, 2011 to October 28, 2011. That the new Case Management
5
Conference date shall be treated as the initial Case Management Conference date for the
6
purpose of calculating the deadline for meetings between counsel, initial disclosures, and
7
reports to the Court pursuant Rule 26. The parties shall complete mediation before the
8
new case management conference date. The parties shall continue to exchange pre-
9
mediation discovery as described in the February 22, 2011 order .
10
DATED: June 2, 2011
LITTLER MENDELSON
MICHELLE HEVERLY
KEITH JACOBY
11
12
13
By: /s/ Keith A/ Jacoby
Keith A. Jacoby
Attorneys for Defendant
RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS,
INC.
14
15
16
17
18
DATED: June 2, 2011
THE GRAVES FIRM
ALLEN GRAVES
19
20
By: /s/ Allen Graves
Allen Graves
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JIM SWAIN
23
ORDER
UNIT
ED
It is so ordered.
Firmwide:102014933.1 029826.2060
harle
Judge C
ERED
By:_________________________________
Hon. Charles Breyer s R. Breyer
RT
28
ER
H
-3-
LI
June 3, 2011
DATED:_________________
27
O ORD
IT IS S
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
A
26
NO
25
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
S
24
R NIA
22
FO
21
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?