Swain v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.

Filing 22

ORDER regarding mediation and CMC re 21 Stipulation filed by Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/28/2011 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/3/2011. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 THE GRAVES FIRM ALLEN GRAVES (SB# 204580) E-mail: allen@gravesfirm.com ELIZABETH SULLIVAN (SB# 212482) E-mail: liz@gravesfirm.com 790 E. Colorado Blvd., 9th Floor Pasadena, CA 91101 Telephone: (626) 240-0575 Facsimile: (626) 737-7013 Attorneys for Plaintiff Jim Swain 8 9 10 11 Keith A. Jacoby (SB #150233) LITTLER MENDELSON A Professional Corporation 2049 Century Park East, 5th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067-3107 Email: kjacoby@littler.com Telephone: 310.553-0308 Facsimile: 310.553.5583 Michelle B. Heverly (SB #178660) Erica H. Kelley (SB # 221702) LITTLER MENDELSON 50 W. San Fernando Street, 15th Floor San Jose, CA 95113 Email: mheverly@littler.com Email: ekelley@littler.com Telephone: (408) 998-4150 Facsimile: (408) 288-5686 Attorneys for Defendant Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 21 CASE NO. 3:10-cv-04192-CRB Jim Swain, v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MEDIATION AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Pursuant to 28 USC §1447(C), the only parties that have appeared in this action, 2 Plaintiff Jim Swain (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. 3 (“Defendant”), through their respective counsel, hereby jointly stipulate and request that 4 the Court change the date of the Case Management Conference in the above-captioned 5 matter from its current date of July 22, 2011 to October 28, 2011. The parties further 6 stipulate and request that the new Case Management Conference date be treated as the 7 initial Case Management Conference date for the purpose of calculating the deadline for 8 meetings between counsel, initial disclosures, and reports to the Court pursuant Rule 26. 9 10 11 12 13 14 This stipulation is made and entered into by the parties on the following basis: 1) On February 22, 2011, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this Court ordered that the parties complete a private mediation no later than July 18, 2011. 2) Pursuant to this Court’s Order, the parties scheduled a mediation before JAMS mediator Joel Grossman for June 17, 2011. 3) This Court’s order of February 22 also required the parties to exchange 15 specific documents in advance of the mediation. Among the requirements was that 16 Defendant provide Plaintiff with a random sample of paper time records for members of 17 the putative class. 18 4) Pursuant to the Court’s order of February 22, Plaintiff provided Defendant 19 with a list that specified a random sample of locations and time periods for which paper 20 records would be provided. 21 5) After gathering approximately 50% of the requested records, Defendant 22 determined that the sample requested by Plaintiff would require the production of 23 approximately 28,000 paper records. 24 6) To date, Defendant has produced nearly 14,000 pages of documents. 25 7) The parties have agreed that a smaller sample should be used, and Plaintiff 26 has provided Defendant with a modified sample request. Defendant is currently in the 27 process of reviewing that modified request. 28 -1JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 8) As a result of the sheer number of documents that have been produced and 2 the need to further modify the sample, the current mediation date of June 17, 2011 will not 3 provide sufficient time for Defendant to produce the remaining documents and allow the 4 parties to evaluate the data and prepare their positions before mediation. 5 9) The parties contacted the mediator, Joel Grossman, and based on his 6 schedule and the schedule of the parties, the first available date to continue the mediation 7 is September 7, 2011, which the parties have already confirmed with Mr. Grossman. 8 9 10 10) Defendant represents that as of this date, Defendant has not made any payments pursuant to California Labor Code §226.7. On that basis, Plaintiff will withdraw his Special Interrogatories 7 and 8. 11 11) Defendant has been diligently gathering and reviewing documents that were 12 requested by Plaintiff in an attempt to meet the current deadlines, but given the number of 13 documents involved, the current mediation date of June 17, 2011 is simply impossible to 14 meet. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED: The parties stipulate and respectfully request the Court order as follows: the 3 Case Management Conference in the above-captioned matter is hereby changed from its 4 current date of July 22, 2011 to October 28, 2011. That the new Case Management 5 Conference date shall be treated as the initial Case Management Conference date for the 6 purpose of calculating the deadline for meetings between counsel, initial disclosures, and 7 reports to the Court pursuant Rule 26. The parties shall complete mediation before the 8 new case management conference date. The parties shall continue to exchange pre- 9 mediation discovery as described in the February 22, 2011 order . 10 DATED: June 2, 2011 LITTLER MENDELSON MICHELLE HEVERLY KEITH JACOBY 11 12 13 By: /s/ Keith A/ Jacoby Keith A. Jacoby Attorneys for Defendant RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC. 14 15 16 17 18 DATED: June 2, 2011 THE GRAVES FIRM ALLEN GRAVES 19 20 By: /s/ Allen Graves Allen Graves Attorneys for Plaintiff JIM SWAIN 23 ORDER UNIT ED It is so ordered. Firmwide:102014933.1 029826.2060 harle Judge C ERED By:_________________________________ Hon. Charles Breyer s R. Breyer RT 28 ER H -3- LI June 3, 2011 DATED:_________________ 27 O ORD IT IS S JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER A 26 NO 25 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O S 24 R NIA 22 FO 21 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?