Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Juniper Networks, Inc.
Filing
164
ORDER ON IMPLICIT'S MOTION TO COMPEL 152 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 11/8/2012)
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
No. C 10-04234 SI
IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC.,
ORDER ON IMPLICIT’S MOTION TO
COMPEL
Plaintiff,
v.
JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,
Defendant.
/
11
12
Currently before the Court is Implicit’s motion to compel Juniper to produce the SRX source
13
code files relied upon by Juniper’s expert, Dr. Peter Alexander, and to produce Dr. Alexander for an
14
additional two hours of deposition. [Docket No. 152].
15
Juniper points out that Implicit did not request production of this material until Dr. Alexander’s
16
October 16th deposition was in progress, even though Implicit had Dr. Alexander’s rebuttal report,
17
identifying portions of the source code he relied on, for over a month before the deposition commenced.
18
Implicit could have, but did not, ask for production of hard copies of that material, as well as any
19
additional source code Dr. Alexander reviewed, before his deposition.
20
Juniper has agreed to produce hard copies of the source code files identified by Dr. Alexander
21
in his expert report. [Docket No. 153]. The Court further ORDERS Juniper to produce hard copies of
22
any source code that Dr. Alexander reviewed, as identified in his deposition. In all other respects, the
23
motion is DENIED.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: November 8, 2012
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?