Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Juniper Networks, Inc.

Filing 188

ORDER RE PARTIES' APPLICATIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF JUNIPER'S 179 180 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 11/26/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC.,

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

No. C 10-04234 SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE PARTIES’ APPLICATIONS
TO FILE UNDER SEAL HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF
JUNIPER’S

v.
JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,

12

Defendant.

/

13
14

Currently before the Court are the following applications to file under seal: (1) Stipulation for

15

Leave to File Under Seal portions of Juniper’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and

16

Exhibits thereto [Docket No. 165]; (2) Stipulation for Leave to File Under Seal portions of Implicit

17

Networks’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and Exhibits thereto [Docket No. 179];

18

and (3) Administrative Motion for Leave to File Under Seal portions of the Exhibits attached to the

19

Dixon Declaration [Docket No. 180].

20

The Court has reviewed the declaration of Scott J. Coonan, submitted in support of the sealing.

21

Docket No. 187-1. Mr. Coonan declares that the information sought to be sealed is necessary to protect

22

Juniper’s highly confidential source code and the confidential product configurations used by Juniper’s

23

clients.

24

The Court GRANTS the applications to file under seal [Docket Nos. 165, 179 & 180], for the

25

specific documents and portions of documents identified in Mr. Coonan’s November 19, 2012

26

declaration to the extent the material at issue discusses or identifies Juniper’s source code or confidential

27

customer product configurations.

28

Juniper shall ensure that the public versions of the following documents e-filed in the docket

1

redact only the information allowed by this Order: Juniper’s Motion for Summary Judgement of Non-

2

Infringement [Docket No. 166], the Hefazi Declaration [Docket No. 166-1], the Alexander Declaration

3

[Docket No. 166-6], and the Dixon Declaration [Docket No. 176-1].

4

Implicit shall ensure that the public versions of the following documents e-filed in the docket

5

redact only the information allowed by this Order: Implicit’s Opposition to Juniper’s Motion for

6

Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement [Docket No. 181; and Hosie Declaration [Docket No. 182].

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

Dated: November 26, 2012
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2