Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Juniper Networks, Inc.
Filing
188
ORDER RE PARTIES' APPLICATIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF JUNIPER'S 179 180 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 11/26/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC.,
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
No. C 10-04234 SI
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE PARTIES’ APPLICATIONS
TO FILE UNDER SEAL HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF
JUNIPER’S
v.
JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,
12
Defendant.
/
13
14
Currently before the Court are the following applications to file under seal: (1) Stipulation for
15
Leave to File Under Seal portions of Juniper’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and
16
Exhibits thereto [Docket No. 165]; (2) Stipulation for Leave to File Under Seal portions of Implicit
17
Networks’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and Exhibits thereto [Docket No. 179];
18
and (3) Administrative Motion for Leave to File Under Seal portions of the Exhibits attached to the
19
Dixon Declaration [Docket No. 180].
20
The Court has reviewed the declaration of Scott J. Coonan, submitted in support of the sealing.
21
Docket No. 187-1. Mr. Coonan declares that the information sought to be sealed is necessary to protect
22
Juniper’s highly confidential source code and the confidential product configurations used by Juniper’s
23
clients.
24
The Court GRANTS the applications to file under seal [Docket Nos. 165, 179 & 180], for the
25
specific documents and portions of documents identified in Mr. Coonan’s November 19, 2012
26
declaration to the extent the material at issue discusses or identifies Juniper’s source code or confidential
27
customer product configurations.
28
Juniper shall ensure that the public versions of the following documents e-filed in the docket
1
redact only the information allowed by this Order: Juniper’s Motion for Summary Judgement of Non-
2
Infringement [Docket No. 166], the Hefazi Declaration [Docket No. 166-1], the Alexander Declaration
3
[Docket No. 166-6], and the Dixon Declaration [Docket No. 176-1].
4
Implicit shall ensure that the public versions of the following documents e-filed in the docket
5
redact only the information allowed by this Order: Implicit’s Opposition to Juniper’s Motion for
6
Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement [Docket No. 181; and Hosie Declaration [Docket No. 182].
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Dated: November 26, 2012
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?