Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Juniper Networks, Inc.

Filing 35

ORDER REGARDING PATENT LOCAL RULE 2-2 INTERIM MODEL PROTECTIVE ORDER by Juniper (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2011)

1 IRELL & MANELLA LLP
Morgan Chu (SBN 70446)
2 ([e-mail])
Jonathan S. Kagan (SBN 166039)
3 ([e-mail])
1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
4 Los Angeles, California 90067-4276
Telephone: [phone]
5 Facsimile: [phone]

HOSIE RICE LLP
Spencer Hosie (SBN 101777)
([e-mail])
George F. Bishop (SBN 89205)
[e-mail]
Diane S. Rice (SBN 118303)
[e-mail]
William P. Nelson (SBN 196091)
[e-mail]
Transamerica Pyramid, 34th Floor
600 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6 David C. McPhie (SBN 231520)
([e-mail])
7 Rebecca L. Clifford (SBN 254105)
([e-mail])
8 840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
Newport Beach, California 92660-6324
9 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
10
Attorneys for Defendant
11 JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.

Attorneys for Plaintiff
IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC.

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16 IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC.,
17

Plaintiff,

18

vs.

19 JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,
20

Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:10-cv-4234-SI
AGREED STIPULATION REGARDING
PATENT LOCAL RULE 2-2 INTERIM
MODEL PROTECTIVE ORDER
Action filed: September 20, 2010

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2492064

AGREED STIPULATION REGARDING PATENT LOCAL RULE 2-2 INTERIM MODEL PROTECTIVE
ORDER

1

WHEREAS Patent Local Rule 2-2 provides that the Northern District Interim Model

2 Protective Order (“Model Protective Order”) governs this case and will continue to govern unless
3 the parties agree otherwise;
4

WHEREAS, paragraph 8 of the Model Protective Order imposes a prosecution bar

5 applicable to “the subject matter of the invention and of highly confidential technical information
6 to be produced”;
7

WHEREAS, for the avoidance of doubt, the parties wish to memorialize their agreement

8 regarding the subject matter of the prosecution bar in this case;
9

THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate that “the subject matter of the invention and of

10 highly confidential technical information to be produced,” for purposes of the Model Protective
11 Order in this case (including paragraph 8) is “data demultiplexing, or network routers, switches,
12 and security products, including the operating system and software used to control network
13 routers, switches, or security products.” Moreover, the parties are agreed and hereby stipulate that
14 this definition of the subject matter of the prosecution bar shall apply in this case retroactively and
15 going forward as if inserted in full as appropriate into paragraph 8 of the Model Protective Order,
16 and shall be enforceable as if fully set forth therein.
17
18 DATED: September 13, 2011

HOSIE RICE LLP

19
20

By: /s/ George F. Bishop
George F. Bishop

21

Attorneys for Plaintiff Implicit Networks, Inc.

22

IRELL & MANELLA LLP

23
24

By: /s/ Nima Hefazi____
Nima Hefazi

25

Attorney for Defendant Juniper Networks,
Inc.

26
27
28

//
//
-12492064.1 05

AGREED STIPULATION REGARDING PATENT LOCAL RULE 2-2 INTERIM MODEL PROTECTIVE
ORDER

1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3

9/15
DATED: _____________,2011

___________________________
Hon. Susan Illston
United States District Court Judge

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-22492064

AGREED STIPULATION REGARDING PATENT LOCAL RULE 2-2 INTERIM MODEL PROTECTIVE
ORDER