SPECS USA Corp. v. SPECS Surface Nano Analysis GmbH et al

Filing 57

NOTICE OF REFERENCE AND ORDER RE DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 4/3/2012. (hlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

No. C 10-04250 JW (DMR)
IN RE SPECS
___________________________________/

NOTICE OF REFERENCE AND ORDER
RE DISCOVERY PROCEDURES

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
The above matter has been referred to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu for all discovery
disputes.
Parties shall comply with the procedures in this order, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

20

and the Northern District of California’s Local Rules, General Orders, and General Standing Orders.

21

Local rules, general orders, general standing orders, and a summary of the general orders’ electronic

22

filing requirements (including the procedures for emailing proposed orders to chambers) are

23

available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov. The parties’ failure to comply with any of the rules or

24

orders may be a ground for sanctions.

25
26

RESOLUTION OF DISCOVERY DISPUTES
In order to respond to discovery disputes in a flexible, cost-effective and efficient manner,

27

the court uses the following procedure. The parties shall not file formal discovery motions. Instead,

28

as required by the federal and local rules, the parties shall first meet and confer to try to resolve their

conducted by letter, e-mail, or fax. If disagreements remain, the parties shall file a joint letter no

3

later than five (5) business days after the meet and confer session. Lead trial counsel for both

4

parties must sign the letter, which shall include an attestation that the parties met and conferred in

5

person or by telephone regarding all issues prior to filing the letter. Going issue-by-issue, the joint

6

letter shall describe each unresolved issue, summarize each party’s position with appropriate legal

7

authority; and provide each party’s final proposed compromise before moving to the next issue. The

8

joint letter shall not exceed ten (10) pages without leave of court. In the rare instance that a joint

9

letter is not possible, each side may submit a letter not to exceed four (4) pages, which shall include

10

an explanation of why a joint letter was not possible. When appropriate, the parties may submit one

11
For the Northern District of California

disagreements. The meet and confer session must be in person or by telephone, and may not be

2

United States District Court

1

exhibit to the letter that sets forth each discovery request at issue in full, followed immediately by

12

the objections and/or responses thereto. No other information shall be included in any such exhibit.

13

No other exhibits shall be submitted without prior approval by the court. The court will review the

14

submission(s) and determine whether formal briefing or proceedings are necessary.

15

In emergencies during discovery events (such as depositions), any party may, after

16

exhausting good faith attempts to resolve disputed issues, seek judicial intervention pursuant to Civil

17

L.R. 37-1(b) by contacting the court through the courtroom deputy. If the court is unavailable, the

18

discovery event shall proceed with objections noted for the record.

19

In the event that a discovery hearing is ordered, the court has found that it is often efficient

20

and beneficial for the parties if counsel appear in person. This provides the opportunity, where

21

appropriate, to engage counsel in resolving aspects of the discovery dispute while remaining

22

available to rule on any disputes that counsel are not able to resolve. For this reason, the court

23

expects counsel to appear in person. Permission for a party to attend by telephone may be granted,

24

in the court's discretion, upon written request made at least two weeks in advance of the hearing if

25

the court determines that good cause exists to excuse personal attendance, and that personal

26

attendance is not needed in order to have an effective discovery hearing. The facts establishing good

27

cause must be set forth in the request.

28

2

1
2
3
4

CHAMBERS COPIES AND PROPOSED ORDERS
All filings relating to discovery dispute referred to Magistrate Judge Ryu shall list the civil
case number and the district court judge’s initials followed by the designation “(DMR).”
Under Civil L.R. 5-1(b), parties must lodge an extra paper copy of any filing and mark it as a

5

copy for “Chambers.” Please three-hole punch the chambers copy and submit it to the Oakland

6

Clerk’s Office. In a case subject to electronic filing, chambers copies must be submitted by the

7

close of the next court day following the day the papers are filed electronically. Any proposed

8

stipulation or proposed order in a case subject to electronic filing shall be submitted by email to

9

[e-mail] as a word processing format attachment on the same day that the
document is e-filed. This address should only be used for this stated purpose unless otherwise

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

directed by the court.

12

PRIVILEGE LOGS

13

If a party withholds information that is responsive to a discovery request by claiming that it

14

is privileged or otherwise protected from discovery, that party shall promptly prepare and provide a

15

privilege log that is sufficiently detailed and informative for the opposing party to assess whether a

16

document's designation as privileged is justified. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(5). The privilege log shall

17

set forth the privilege relied upon and specify separately for each document or for each category of

18

similarly situated documents:

19

a.

20

The title and description of the document, including number of pages or Batesnumber range;

21

b.

The subject matter addressed in the document;

22

c.

The identity and position of its author(s);

23

d.

The identity and position of all addressees and recipients;

24

e.

The date the document was prepared and, if different, the date(s) on which it was sent

25
26

to or shared with persons other than its author(s); and
f.

The specific basis for the claim that the document is privileged or protected.

27
28

3

1

Failure to furnish this information promptly may be deemed a waiver of the privilege or protection.

2
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

Dated: April 3, 2012

6

DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge

7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4