SPECS USA Corp. v. SPECS Surface Nano Analysis GmbH et al

Filing 63

ORDER re 62 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 61 Order on Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Deadline for Submission of Joint Letter Brief re Discovery Issues filed by SPECS Surface Nano Analysis, Inc., SPECS Surface Nano Analysis GmbH. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 4/16/2012. (hlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:10-cv-04250-JW Document62 Filed04/16/12 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KENNETH E. KELLER (SBN 71450) kkeller@kksrr.com MICHAEL D. LISI (SBN 196974) mlisi@kksrr.com GARTH A. ROSENGREN SBN 215732) grosengren@kksrr.com KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP 555 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 249-8330 Facsimile: (415) 249-8333 Attorneys for Plaintiffs SPECS SURFACE NANO ANALYSIS GmbH and SPECS SURFACE NANO ANALYSIS, INC. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 Case No. CV 10-4250 JW 12 In Re SPECS SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF JOINT LETTER BRIEF RE DISCOVERY ISSUES 13 14 15 16 Judge: Hon. Donna N. Ryu Courtroom: 4, 3rd Floor (Oakland) Complaint Filed: August 19, 2010 17 18 19 20 WHEREAS on April 2, 2012, SPECS Surface Nano Analysis GmbH (“SPECS GmbH”) 21 and SPECS Surface Nano Analysis, Inc. (“SPECS Nano”) filed (1) a Motion for Protective 22 Order and (2) a Motion to Compel Attendance of Defendants at Depositions, along with a 23 Motion to Shorten Time, and noticed those motions for hearing before the Honorable James 24 Ware; 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS on April 3, 2012, Judge Ware denied the motion to shorten time, and referred the discovery motions to this Court (Docket Nos. 56, 57); WHEREAS that same day, this Court issued an order requiring that the parties comply 1 ____________________________________________________________________________ SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF JOINT LETTER BRIEF RE DISCOVERY ISSUES Case No. CV 10-4250 JW Case3:10-cv-04250-JW Document62 Filed04/16/12 Page2 of 3 1 with the Court’s standing order regarding the submission of a joint letter addressing discovery 2 disputes, and further ordered that any such letter relating to the previously filed motions should 3 be filed no later than Friday, April 13, 2012 (Docket No. 58); 4 WHEREAS, because of conflicts with other matters, including out-of-state travel and 5 pretrial filing deadlines in a matter before the Honorable Claudia Wilken, counsel for SPECS 6 GmbH and SPECS Nano met and conferred with counsel for Rickmer Kose and SPECS USA 7 Corp., and the parties agreed to extend the deadline for submission of the joint letter until 8 Wednesday, April 18, 2012, subject to approval of this Court; 9 WHEREAS, on April 10, 2012, the parties submitted a Stipulation and Proposed Order 10 seeking an extension of the deadline for the joint letter brief until April 18th (e-docket no. 60); WHEREAS, on April 11, 2012, the Court granted that request and entered an order 11 12 setting the deadline for submission of the joint letter brief for April 18, 2012; 13 WHEREAS, the following day, on April 12, 2012, counsel for SPECS GMB and 14 SPECS Inc., Michael Lisi, learned that his father-in-law had passed away, and the services now 15 are scheduled such that Mr. Lisi will be out of town on April 17 and April 18; 16 WHEREAS, on April 13, 2012, upon learning of this issue, counsel for SPECS USA 17 and Kose graciously offered to extend the filing deadline to accommodate Mr. Lisi’s family 18 issues; and 19 THEREFORE, the parties have now met and conferred and hereby stipulate, subject to 20 the approval of this Court, that the deadline for submission of the parties’ joint letter brief shall 21 be continued to Friday, April 20, 2012; and that SPECS GmbH and SPECS Inc. will provide 22 their portions of the letter brief by the close of business on April 16, 2012, while SPECS USA 23 and Kose shall provide their portions of the letter brief by no later than 11 AM on Thursday, 24 April 19, 2012. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 ____________________________________________________________________________ SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF JOINT LETTER BRIEF RE DISCOVERY ISSUES Case No. CV 10-4250 JW 2 Case3:10-cv-04250-JW Document62 Filed04/16/12 Page3 of 3 1 Dated: April 16, 2012 KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP 2 By: ____/s/ Michael D. Lisi____________________ MICHAEL D. LISI Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants SPECS SURFACE NANO ANALYSIS GMBH AND SPECS SURFACE NANO ANALYSIS, INC 3 4 5 6 7 Dated: April 16, 2012 NOSSAMAN LLP 8 By: ____/s/ Chi Soo Kim_______________________ CHI SOO KIM Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-claimaints SPECS USA CORP. AND RICKMER KOSE 9 10 11 12 13 I hereby attest that I have been authorized by the above counsel to execute on their 14 behalf this Second Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Deadline for Submission of 15 Joint Letter Brief re Discovery Issues. Executed on this 16th day of April, 2012, at San Francisco, California. 17 _________/s/____________________________ MICHAEL D. LISI 19 S UNIT ED PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 ________________________________________ THE HON. DONNA M. RYUa M. Ryu nn UNITED STATESdge Do Ju MAGISTRATE JUDGE FO RT 24 April 16, 2012 Dated: __________________ NO 23 D RDERE OO IT IS S H ER LI 21 RT U O 20 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA 18 25 26 A 16 N F D IS T IC T O R C 27 28 3 ____________________________________________________________________________ SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF JOINT LETTER BRIEF RE DISCOVERY ISSUES Case No. CV 10-4250 JW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?