SPECS USA Corp. v. SPECS Surface Nano Analysis GmbH et al
Filing
63
ORDER re 62 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 61 Order on Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Deadline for Submission of Joint Letter Brief re Discovery Issues filed by SPECS Surface Nano Analysis, Inc., SPECS Surface Nano Analysis GmbH. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 4/16/2012. (hlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2012)
Case3:10-cv-04250-JW Document62 Filed04/16/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
KENNETH E. KELLER (SBN 71450) kkeller@kksrr.com
MICHAEL D. LISI (SBN 196974) mlisi@kksrr.com
GARTH A. ROSENGREN SBN 215732) grosengren@kksrr.com
KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP
555 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 249-8330
Facsimile: (415) 249-8333
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SPECS SURFACE NANO ANALYSIS GmbH
and SPECS SURFACE NANO ANALYSIS, INC.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
Case No. CV 10-4250 JW
12
In Re SPECS
SECOND STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF
JOINT LETTER BRIEF RE DISCOVERY
ISSUES
13
14
15
16
Judge:
Hon. Donna N. Ryu
Courtroom:
4, 3rd Floor (Oakland)
Complaint Filed: August 19, 2010
17
18
19
20
WHEREAS on April 2, 2012, SPECS Surface Nano Analysis GmbH (“SPECS GmbH”)
21
and SPECS Surface Nano Analysis, Inc. (“SPECS Nano”) filed (1) a Motion for Protective
22
Order and (2) a Motion to Compel Attendance of Defendants at Depositions, along with a
23
Motion to Shorten Time, and noticed those motions for hearing before the Honorable James
24
Ware;
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS on April 3, 2012, Judge Ware denied the motion to shorten time, and
referred the discovery motions to this Court (Docket Nos. 56, 57);
WHEREAS that same day, this Court issued an order requiring that the parties comply
1
____________________________________________________________________________
SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR
SUBMISSION OF JOINT LETTER BRIEF RE DISCOVERY ISSUES
Case No. CV 10-4250 JW
Case3:10-cv-04250-JW Document62 Filed04/16/12 Page2 of 3
1
with the Court’s standing order regarding the submission of a joint letter addressing discovery
2
disputes, and further ordered that any such letter relating to the previously filed motions should
3
be filed no later than Friday, April 13, 2012 (Docket No. 58);
4
WHEREAS, because of conflicts with other matters, including out-of-state travel and
5
pretrial filing deadlines in a matter before the Honorable Claudia Wilken, counsel for SPECS
6
GmbH and SPECS Nano met and conferred with counsel for Rickmer Kose and SPECS USA
7
Corp., and the parties agreed to extend the deadline for submission of the joint letter until
8
Wednesday, April 18, 2012, subject to approval of this Court;
9
WHEREAS, on April 10, 2012, the parties submitted a Stipulation and Proposed Order
10
seeking an extension of the deadline for the joint letter brief until April 18th (e-docket no. 60);
WHEREAS, on April 11, 2012, the Court granted that request and entered an order
11
12
setting the deadline for submission of the joint letter brief for April 18, 2012;
13
WHEREAS, the following day, on April 12, 2012, counsel for SPECS GMB and
14
SPECS Inc., Michael Lisi, learned that his father-in-law had passed away, and the services now
15
are scheduled such that Mr. Lisi will be out of town on April 17 and April 18;
16
WHEREAS, on April 13, 2012, upon learning of this issue, counsel for SPECS USA
17
and Kose graciously offered to extend the filing deadline to accommodate Mr. Lisi’s family
18
issues; and
19
THEREFORE, the parties have now met and conferred and hereby stipulate, subject to
20
the approval of this Court, that the deadline for submission of the parties’ joint letter brief shall
21
be continued to Friday, April 20, 2012; and that SPECS GmbH and SPECS Inc. will provide
22
their portions of the letter brief by the close of business on April 16, 2012, while SPECS USA
23
and Kose shall provide their portions of the letter brief by no later than 11 AM on Thursday,
24
April 19, 2012.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
____________________________________________________________________________
SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR
SUBMISSION OF JOINT LETTER BRIEF RE DISCOVERY ISSUES
Case No. CV 10-4250 JW
2
Case3:10-cv-04250-JW Document62 Filed04/16/12 Page3 of 3
1
Dated: April 16, 2012
KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP
2
By: ____/s/ Michael D. Lisi____________________
MICHAEL D. LISI
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants
SPECS SURFACE NANO ANALYSIS GMBH
AND SPECS SURFACE NANO ANALYSIS, INC
3
4
5
6
7
Dated: April 16, 2012
NOSSAMAN LLP
8
By: ____/s/ Chi Soo Kim_______________________
CHI SOO KIM
Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-claimaints
SPECS USA CORP. AND RICKMER KOSE
9
10
11
12
13
I hereby attest that I have been authorized by the above counsel to execute on their
14
behalf this Second Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Deadline for Submission of
15
Joint Letter Brief re Discovery Issues.
Executed on this 16th day of April, 2012, at San Francisco, California.
17
_________/s/____________________________
MICHAEL D. LISI
19
S
UNIT
ED
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
________________________________________
THE HON. DONNA M. RYUa M. Ryu
nn
UNITED STATESdge Do
Ju MAGISTRATE JUDGE
FO
RT
24
April 16, 2012
Dated: __________________
NO
23
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
H
ER
LI
21
RT
U
O
20
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
R NIA
18
25
26
A
16
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
27
28
3
____________________________________________________________________________
SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR
SUBMISSION OF JOINT LETTER BRIEF RE DISCOVERY ISSUES
Case No. CV 10-4250 JW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?