SPECS USA Corp. v. SPECS Surface Nano Analysis GmbH et al

Filing 70

ORDER re 64 Plaintiffs' motion for protective order filed by SPECS Surface Nano Analysis, Inc., SPECS Surface Nano Analysis GmbH. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 5/3/2012. (hlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. C 10-04250 JW (DMR) IN RE SPECS ___________________________________/ ORDER RE: JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER (Docket No. 64) 12 13 On May 3, 2012, the court held a telephonic hearing on the discovery disputes raised in the 14 parties’ joint discovery letter dated April 20, 2012 (doc. no. 64). Having reviewed the papers and 15 relevant legal authority and having considered the argument of counsel, the court orders that the 16 motion for protective order of Plaintiffs SPECS GmbH and SPECS Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) is GRANTED 17 IN PART AND DENIED IN PART for the reasons stated at the hearing. The court orders that the 18 depositions of Messrs. Lembke and Thissen must be held in Boston, or alternatively may be held in 19 New York if the parties agree that New York is more convenient. Each party shall bear its own 20 travel and deposition costs. The court further orders that Plaintiffs serve a written statement 21 verifying that Tobias Vancura is no longer affiliated with or employed by SPECS GmbH or SPECS 22 Inc. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: May 3, 2012 26 27 28 DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?