Cutting Edge Audio Group LLP v. Cutting Edge Technology

Filing 7

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 6 Stipulation filed by Cutting Edge Technology. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/18/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2010)

1 ELKINS KALT WEINTRAUB REUBEN GARTSIDE LLP JEFFREY K. RIFFER, State Bar No. 87016 2 [e-mail] ERIC J. LORENZINI, State Bar No. 218433 [e-mail] 3 1800 Century Park East, i h Floor 4 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 310.746.4499 6 Attorneys for Defendant Cutting Edge Technology

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

9
10 11

CUTTING EDGE AUDIO GROUP, LLC D/B/A CUTTING EDGE AUDIO AND 12 VIDEO GROUP, Plaintiff,

CASE No. CVl 0-4265 EMC STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME OF DEFENDANT CUTTING EDGE TECHNOLOGY TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT ; ORDER Judge: Edward M. Chen None

13 14 15 16

v.
CUTTING EDGE TECHNOLOGY,

Trial Date: Defendant.

18

Plaintiff Cutting Edge Audio Group, LLC d/b/a Cutting Edge Audio and Video Group

19 (hereinafter "Plaintiff"), on the one hand, and Defendant Cutting Edge Technology (hereinafter 20 21 22 23 24 25
1.

"Defendant"), on the other hand, through their counsel of record hereby stipulate and agree as follows: RECITALS On September 21,2010, Plaintiff filed its Complaint with this Court. Defendant was served with the Summons and Complaint on September 22,2010. Pursuant to the Summons, Defendant's response must be filed twenty-one days

2. 3.

26 after service, which is October 13,2010. 27 4. Local Rule 6-1 provides that parties may stipulate in writing, without a Court order,

28 to extend the time within which to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint, provided the
31524vl

CVlO-4265 EMC STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1 change will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order.
2

5.

The parties agree that a thirty-day extension of the time that Defendant has to

3 answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is appropriate and that such an extension will not
4

alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order. STIPULATION
1.

5
6

Plaintiff and Defendant hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Plaintiff to file

7 its answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended for thirty days, from October

8 13,2010 to November 12,2010.
9
"-

:::i
0
U.l

(J) (J)

10
11 DATED: October

;;; re<:

C?~:g~
t-. m
~

« z Ul

~

0

r-. .....

0

I'-:

v <Ci v

v

lL,

2010

ELKINS KALT WEINTRAUB REUBEN GARTSIDE LLP

12
13

o..<!!

~!UE!U w.gu.
iXl~~·

~ ...r .!U .r/) -

'E t3

~ tJ ~
11

(\

~

..)

()

~
---.

c: :g, ~ III c: r-. ;:s:0«' o (/) ~
¢i
Ul
0 0 ..JCO..J

~~Og r- :~"'v ::I ..<!! "':
r<'")

14
15

16
17

~

«-

OJ c;:
.s::
0

DATED: October JL, 2010

KA YE SCHOLER, LLP

C/l

~

:2 ..J

Z

~

III

0.

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
.'1524vl

By:

./1IJ'&;u

William Sloan Coats Attorneys for Plaintiff Cutting Edge Audio Group, LLC d/b/a Cutting Edge Audio and Video Group

&

Cub

MA

IT IS SO ORDERED
UNIT ED

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

_________________ ERED O ORD Edward M. Chen IT IS S U.S. Magistrate Judge Chen ard M.
NO
d Judge E w

S

ISTRIC ES D TC AT T

R NIA

RT U O

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

RT

H

2

CVIO-4265 EMC