Palantir Technologies, Inc. v. Palantir.net, Inc.

Filing 130

ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 129 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER filed by Palantir Technologies, Inc... Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/11/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2012)

Case3:10-cv-04283-CRB Document129 Filed06/07/12 Page1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
ELLIOT R. PETERS - #158708
[e-mail]
DANIEL PURCELL - #191424
[e-mail]
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
415-397-7188
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11

PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

Case No. 10-CV-04283 CRB
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

v.
Judge:

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

PALANTIR.NET, INC.,

15

Defendant.

Date Comp. Filed:
Trial Date:

September 23, 2010
None set

16
17

Palantir.net, Inc.,
Counter-Claimant,

18
19
20
21

v.
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Counter-Defendant.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 10-CV-04283 CRB
671004.01

Case3:10-cv-04283-CRB Document129 Filed06/07/12 Page2 of 3

1

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

2

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by Plaintiff Palantir Technologies, Inc.

3

(“PTI”) and Defendant Palantir.net, Inc. (“PNI”), by and through their respective undersigned

4

counsel, and subject to the approval of the Court, that, pursuant to settlement and Federal Rule of

5

Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), all claims and counterclaims in this action between PTI and PNI are

6

hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees in this

7

action.

8

Dated: June 7, 2012

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

9
10

By:

11

/s/ Daniel Purcell
DANIEL PURCELL
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

12
13

Dated: June 7, 2012

MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP

14
/s/ John R. Labbe
JOHN R. LABBE

15
16

Attorneys for Defendant
PALANTIR.NET, INC.

17
18

[PROPOSED] ORDER

19

RT

28

ORDE

harles
Judge C

NO

27

O
IT IS S

H

E

R NIA

26

The Honorable Charles R. Breyer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
RED

er

R. Brey

FO

25

Dated: June 11, 2012

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LI

23

costs and attorneys’ fees in this action.

A

22

counterclaims in this action are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own

S

21

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, all claims and

UNIT
ED

20

C
1 RN
F
D IS T IC T O
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
R
Case No. 10-CV-04283 CRB
671004.01