Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Golden Key Realty & Mortgage Banker, Inc. et al
Filing
108
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR CONSENT JUDGMENT AND DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Judge William Alsup [denying 101 Motion for Default Judgment; granting 107 Motion to Approve Consent Judgment]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION, in its capacity as
receiver for NetBank, FSB,
12
13
14
15
16
No. C 10-04285 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
GOLDEN KEY REALTY & MORTGAGE
BANKER, INC.; SAMUEL GBILIA,
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
MOTION FOR CONSENT
JUDGMENT AND DENYING
MOTION FOR DEFAULT
JUDGMENT
Defendants.
/
17
18
In this action, Plaintiff FDIC sued defendants Golden Key Realty & Mortgage
19
Banker, Inc. and Mr. Samuel Gbilia. Mr. Gbilia is the president and owner of Golden Key.
20
The operative complaint is the First Amended Complaint, filed October 10, 2011, in which
21
plaintiff asserted claims of negligence and fraud. Defendants did not file an answer.
22
On January 16, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment against defendants.
23
Defendants did not file an opposition.
24
A hearing on the motion for default judgment was scheduled for February 28, 2013.
25
On the morning of February 28, prior to the hearing, plaintiff filed a joint motion for consent
26
judgment signed by plaintiff’s counsel and defendant Mr. Gbilia. Plaintiff’s counsel and
27
defendant Mr. Gbilia attended the hearing.
28
1
2
Parties’ joint motion for consent judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s motion for default
judgment is DENIED AS MOOT. Judgment will be entered in a separate order.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: March 1, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?