Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Golden Key Realty & Mortgage Banker, Inc. et al

Filing 108

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR CONSENT JUDGMENT AND DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Judge William Alsup [denying 101 Motion for Default Judgment; granting 107 Motion to Approve Consent Judgment]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, in its capacity as receiver for NetBank, FSB, 12 13 14 15 16 No. C 10-04285 WHA Plaintiff, v. GOLDEN KEY REALTY & MORTGAGE BANKER, INC.; SAMUEL GBILIA, ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR CONSENT JUDGMENT AND DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Defendants. / 17 18 In this action, Plaintiff FDIC sued defendants Golden Key Realty & Mortgage 19 Banker, Inc. and Mr. Samuel Gbilia. Mr. Gbilia is the president and owner of Golden Key. 20 The operative complaint is the First Amended Complaint, filed October 10, 2011, in which 21 plaintiff asserted claims of negligence and fraud. Defendants did not file an answer. 22 On January 16, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment against defendants. 23 Defendants did not file an opposition. 24 A hearing on the motion for default judgment was scheduled for February 28, 2013. 25 On the morning of February 28, prior to the hearing, plaintiff filed a joint motion for consent 26 judgment signed by plaintiff’s counsel and defendant Mr. Gbilia. Plaintiff’s counsel and 27 defendant Mr. Gbilia attended the hearing. 28 1 2 Parties’ joint motion for consent judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment is DENIED AS MOOT. Judgment will be entered in a separate order. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: March 1, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?