xSides Corporation v. Citrix Systems, Inc.

Filing 43

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS BY XSIDES CORP. AND CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC. ***Civil Case Terminated.Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/9/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2011)

*E-Filed 5/9/11*

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

SPENCER HOSIE (CA Bar No. 101777)
[e-mail]
GEORGE F. BISHOP (CA Bar No. 89205)
[e-mail]
DIANE S. RICE (CA Bar No. 118303)
[e-mail]
WILLIAM P. NELSON (CA Bar No. 196091)
[e-mail]
HOSIE RICE LLP
600 Montgomery Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone] Tel.
[phone] Fax

9 Attorneys for Plaintiff
XSIDES CORPORATION
10
11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14 XSIDES CORPORATION,
15

Case No. C 10-4307 RS

Plaintiff,

STIPULATED MOTION FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF
CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS
BY XSIDES CORPORATION AND
CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

16 v.
17 CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.,
18

Defendant.

19
20
21

Plaintiff xSides Corporation (“xSides”) and Defendant Citrix Systems, Inc. (“Citrix”),

22 pursuant to Rule 41(A)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby stipulate and move
23
for an order dismissing WITH PREJUDICE and in their entirety (1) all claims or
24
counterclaims brought by xSides against Citrix and (2) all claims or counterclaims brought
25
by Citrix against xSides, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees.
26
27
28
STIPULATED MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

CASE NO. C 10-4307 RS

1

Dated: May 9, 2011

/s/ George F. Bishop_________________
GEORGE F. BISHOP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
XSIDES CORPORATION

2
3
4
5

HOSIE RICE LLP

Dated: May 9, 2011

6

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
/s/ J. Anthony Downs
J. ANTHONY DOWNS
Attorney for Defendant
CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.

7
8
9
10
11

I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B. that concurrence in the electronic

12 filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.
13 DATED: May 9, 2011
14
/s/ George F. Bishop_______________
George F. Bishop

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

2

CASE NO. C 10-4307 RS

1
2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
9th
DATED this ___ day of May, 2011.

3
_______________________________________
HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

Case No. C 10-4307 RS