Glaser et al v. Advantage Financial et al

Filing 34

ORDER VACATING OSC HEARING. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 3/1/2011. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2011)

Glaser et al v. Advantage Financial et al

Doc. 34

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 v. 9 ADVANTAGE FINANCIAL, et al., 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
FRANKLIN E GLASER, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C 10-04325 MEJ ORDER VACATING OSC HEARING

Defendants. _____________________________________/

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

On February 18, 2011, the Court ordered Plaintiffs Franklin and Victoria Glaser to show cause why sanctions, including granting Defendants' pending motions to dismiss, should not be imposed for failure to prosecute and respond to court orders. (Dkt. No. 32.) Plaintiffs have failed to respond. However, as Defendants' motions remain pending, the Court VACATES the March 3, 2011 osc hearing so that the case may proceed forthwith on the merits. If the Court determines that a hearing is necessary on Defendants' motions, the Clerk of Court shall inform the parties of the hearing date. As this is the third order to show cause issued against Plaintiffs in this case, the Court warns Plaintiffs that, should their case survive the pending motions to dismiss, they shall not be permitted any more second or third opportunities to comply with their obligations before this Court, i.e., a fourth order to show cause will not be issued; the case shall be dismissed for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 18, 2011 _______________________________ Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Dockets.Justia.com