State of Oregon v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 128

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT(CHIMEI DEFENDANTS). Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 12/13/12. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Harrison J. Frahn IV (SBN 206822)
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
2475 Hanover St.
Palo Alto, California 94304
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Chi Mei Corporation,
Chimei Innolux Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics
USA, Inc., and CMO Japan Co., Ltd.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

11
12

STATE OF OREGON, ex rel. John Kroger, This Document Relates to Individual Case
No. 3:10-cv-4346 SI
Attorney General,

13
14
15

Plaintiffs,
v.

MDL No. 1827

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,

16
17

Master File No. 3:07-md-1827

Defendants.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING TIME TO RESPOND TO
AMENDED COMPLAINT

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-4346 SI; MDL NO. 1827
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

WHEREAS plaintiff State of Oregon (“Oregon”) filed the above captioned lawsuit on
August 10, 2010;

3
4

WHEREAS Oregon filed a first amended complaint on April 15, 2011 (“Amended
Complaint”);

5

WHEREAS Defendants Chi Mei Corporation, Chimei Innolux Corporation, CMO Japan

6

Co., Ltd., and Chi Mei Optoelectronic USA, Inc. (collectively, the “Chimei Defendants”) jointly

7

filed with other defendants a motion to dismiss Count III in its entirety and Count IV to the extent

8

it seeks “disgorgement of profits” as a remedy on June 6, 2011;

9
10

WHEREAS the Court denied Defendants’ joint motion to dismiss Counts III and IV of the
Amended Complaint on July 12, 2011;

11

WHEREAS the Chimei Defendants entered into a stipulation with Oregon on October 24,

12

2012 that the Chimei Defendants’ deadline to answer the Amended Complaint is December 12,

13

2012;

14
15

WHEREAS on October 29, 2012, the Court entered an order extending the Chimei
Defendants’ deadline to answer the Amended Complaint until December 12, 2012;

16
17

WHEREAS the Chimei Defendants have reached agreement on the terms of settlement
with Oregon;

18

WHEREAS postponing indefinitely the Chimei Defendants’ time to respond to the

19

Amended Complaint will not alter the date of any other event or deadline already fixed by the

20

Court;

21

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the

22

undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Oregon, on the one hand, and the

23

Chimei Defendants on the other hand, as follows:

24

The time for the Chimei Defendants to respond to the Amended Complaint shall be

25

extended and a response shall not be required unless the Chimei Defendants/Oregon Settlement

26

Agreement is judicially rejected or lawfully rescinded. If rejection or rescission of the Chimei

27

Defendants/Oregon Settlement Agreement occurs, the Chimei Defendants and Oregon promptly

28
-2-

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-4346 SI; MDL NO. 1827
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

will ask the Court to determine the date by which the Chimei Defendants must respond to the

2

Amended Complaint.

3
4

Dated: December 12, 2012

HAGLUND KELLEY HORNGREN JONES & WILDER
LLP

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

/s/ Michael K. Kelley
Michael E. Haglund (SBN 772030)
Michael K. Kelley (SBN 853782)
Shay S. Scott (SBN 934214)
HAGLUND KELLEY HORNGREN JONES & WILDER
LLP
200 SW Market Street, Suite 1777
Portland, OR 97201
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

12

Counsel for State of Oregon

13

OREGON SENIOR ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL

14

17

Tim D. Nord (SBN 882800)
1162 Court Street, NW
Salem, OR 97301-4096
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

18

Counsel for State of Oregon

15
16

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
/s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV
Harrison J. Frahn IV (SBN 206822)
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Chi Mei Corporation,
Chimei Innolux Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA,
Inc., and CMO Japan Co., Ltd.

28
-3-

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-4346 SI; MDL NO. 1827
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

FILER’S ATTESTATION

2

I, Harrison J. Frahn IV, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to

3

file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby

4

attest that Michael M. Kelley concurs in this filing.

5
6
7
8

/s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV
Harrison J. Frahn IV
Attorneys for Defendants Chi Mei Corporation,
Chimei Innolux Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA,
Inc., and CMO Japan Co., Ltd.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-4346 SI; MDL NO. 1827
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3
4
5

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation set forth above and pursuant to Rule 6-1(a) of the Civil
Local Rules, IT IS SO ORDERED.
December 13
Dated: ________________, 2012

6
By

7

HON. SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5-

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-4346 SI; MDL NO. 1827
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER