State of Oregon v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 138

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting (8628) Stipulation in case 3:07-md-01827-SI Order Setting Revised State of Oregon Deadlines filed by HannStar Display Corporation (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION 12 No. 3:07-md-1827-SI MDL No. 1827 13 14 State of Oregon v. AU Optronics Corp., et al., 15 Case No. 3:10-cv-4346-SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING REVISED STATE OF OREGON DEADLINES 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING REVISED DEADLINES NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI; NO. 3:11-CV-4346 SI 1 2 WHEREAS the above-captioned case has been proceeding with pretrial preparation in 3 accordance with the Court’s Order dated March 22, 2103 (Dkt. No. 7665) and the deadline for 4 close of limited fact discovery unique to the State of Oregon case is presently September 30, 5 2013; WHEREAS counsel for the State of Oregon and counsel for defendants in the State of 6 7 Oregon case believe additional time is needed to complete fact and expert discovery unique to the 8 case; WHEREAS, counsel for the State of Oregon and defendants have met and conferred and 9 10 determined that an approximate six-week extension of all current deadlines would be appropriate; 11 and 12 13 WHEREAS an extension for deadlines in the State of Oregon case will not prejudice any of the parties or the Court because trial dates have not been scheduled for the case. 14 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the State of Oregon and 15 defendants’ liaison counsel, and subject to the concurrence of the Court, that the State of Oregon 16 case will adopt the following schedule: 17 Event Current Date (pursuant to 3/18/13 Order) Revised Date Close of limited fact discovery unique to State of Oregon case September 30, 2013 November 15, 2013 Service of opening expert reports for plaintiffs October 21, 2013 December 6, 2013 23 Service of underlying data and Code October 25, 2013 December 13, 2013 24 Service of opposition expert Reports January 21, 2014 March 7, 2014 25 Service of underlying data and Code January 27, 2014 March 14, 2014 Plaintiffs and Defendants to Serve Proposed List of Summary Judgment Motions (Copies to be Provided to the Court) February 17, 2014 March 31, 2014 18 19 20 21 22 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING REVISED DEADLINES NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI; NO. 3:10-CV-4346 SI 1 2 Current Date (pursuant to 3/18/13 Order) Revised Date February 17, 2014 – February 28, 2014 March 31, 2014 – April 4, 2014 Plaintiffs and Defendants to File with the Court Joint List of Proposed Summary Judgment Motions and Proposed Schedule for Summary Judgment Filings March 10, 2014 April 25, 2014 10 Service of reply expert reports March 24, 2014 May 9, 2014 11 Service of underlying data and Code March 31, 2014 May 16, 2014 12 Close of expert discovery April 30, 2014 June 13, 2014 13 Last Day to File Supplemental List of Proposed Summary Judgment Motions Based Upon New Information or Issues Raised in the Reply Expert Reports April 30, 2014 June 13, 2014 16 Last day to file dispositive Motions May 30, 2014 July 11, 2014 17 Last day to file oppositions to dispositive motions July 11, 2014 August 22, 2014 August 22, 2014 October 3, 2014 September 5, 2014 October 17, 2014 Event 3 4 5 Plaintiffs and Defendants to Meet and Confer Over Proposed List of Summary Judgment Motions and Schedule for Same 6 7 8 9 14 15 18 19 Last day to file reply briefs in support of dispositive motions 20 Last day for hearing dispositive motions 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING REVISED DEADLINES NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI; NO. 3:10-CV-4346 SI 1 2 FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP 3 4 Dated: September 25, 2013 5 By: /s/ Jessica N. Leal 10 Robert E. Freitas (SBN 80948) Jason S. Angell (SBN 221607) Jessica N. Leal (SBN 267232) Facsimile: (650) 593-6301 FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP 100 Marine Parkway, Suite 200 Redwood Shores, California 94065 Telephone: (650) 593-6300 rfreitas@ftklaw.com jangell@ftklaw.com jleal@ftklaw.com 11 Attorneys for Defendant HannStar Display Corp. 6 7 8 9 12 13 NOSSAMAN LLP 14 Dated: September 25, 2013 By: /s. Carl L. Blumenstein 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Christopher A. Nedeau (SBN 81297) Carl L. Blumenstein (SBN 124158) Farschad Farzan (SBN 215194) Natasha A. Saggar Sheth (SBN 282896) NOSSAMAN LLP 50 California Street, 34th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 398-3600 Facsimile: (415) 398-2438 cnedeau@nossaman.com cblumenstein@nossaman.com ffarzan@nossaman.com nsaggarsheth@nossaman.com 22 23 Attorneys for Defendants AU Optronics Corp. and AU Optronics Corporation America 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING REVISED DEADLINES NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI; NO. 3:10-CV-4346 SI 1 WHITE & CASE LLP 2 3 Dated: September 25, 2013 4 By: /s/ Christopher M. Curran Christopher M. Curran (pro hac vice) Email: ccurran@whitecase.com J. Mark Gidley (pro hac vice) Email: mgidley@whitecase.com Martin M. Toto (pro hac vice) Email: mtoto@whitecase.com John H. Chung (pro hac vice) Email: jchung@whitecase.com White & Case LLP 1155 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Telephone: (212) 819-8200 Facsimile: (212) 354-8113 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Attorneys for Toshiba Corp.; Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd.; Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.; and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. 12 13 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Dated: September 25, 2013 By: /s/ Jacob R. Sorensen JOHN M. GRENFELL (CA Bar No. 88500) john.grenfell@pillsburylaw.com JACOB R. SORENSEN (CA Bar No. 209134) jake.sorensen@pillsburylaw.com FUSAE NARA (pro hac vice) fusae.nara@pillsburylaw.com ANDREW D. LANPHERE (CA Bar No. 191479) andrew.lanphere@pillsburylaw.com PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 50 Fremont Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 983-1000 Facsimile: (415) 983-1200 Attorneys for Defendants Sharp Corp. and Sharp Electronics Corp. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING REVISED DEADLINES NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI; NO. 3:10-CV-4346 SI 1 SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON 2 3 4 Dated: September 25, 2013 By: /s/ Robert D. Wick COVINGTON & BURLING LLP Robert D. Wick Neil K. Roman Derek Ludwin 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Telephone: (202) 662-6000 Facsimile: (202) 662-6291 Email: rwick@cov.com nroman@cov.com dludwin@cov.com 5 6 7 8 9 10 Attorneys for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. 11 12 13 PAUL HASTINGS LLP 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Dated: September 25, 2013 By: /s/ Lee F. Berger Holly A. House (State Bar No. 136045) Kevin C. McCann (State Bar No. 120874) Lee F. Berger (State Bar No. 222756) Sean Unger (State Bar No. 231694) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 55 Second Street Twenty-Fourth Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 kevinmccann@paulhastings.com hollyhouse@paulhastings.com leeberger@paulhastings.com seanunger@paulhastings.com Attorneys for Defendants LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc. 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING REVISED DEADLINES NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI; NO. 3:10-CV-4346 SI 1 DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP 2 3 Dated: September 25, 2013 By: /s/ Neal A. Potischman 4 Neal A. Potischman (SBN 254862) Christopher B. Hockett (SBN 121539) Sandra West Neukom (SBN 250389) Samantha H. Knox (SBN 254427) DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP 1600 El Camino Real Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: (650) 752-2000 Facsimile: (650) 752-2111 5 6 7 8 9 10 Counsel for Defendants Chi Mei Corporation, Chimei Innolux Corporation (f/k/a Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp.), Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech Inc. and Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc. 11 12 13 14 MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Dated: September 25, 2013 By: /s/ Kent M. Roger KENT M. ROGER (SBN 95987) HERMAN J. HOYING (SBN 257495) MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 442-1000 Facsimile: (415) 442-1001 Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd. (n/k/a Japan Display Inc.) and Hitachi Electronic Devices, (USA), Inc. 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING REVISED DEADLINES NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI; NO. 3:10-CV-4346 SI 1 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 2 3 Dated: September 25, 2013 By: /s/ Stephen P. Freccero 4 Melvin R. Goldman (SBN 34097) Stephen P. Freccero (SBN 131093) Derek F. Foran (SBN 224569) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 mgoldman@mofo.com sfreccero@mofo.com dforan@mofo.com 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Attorneys for Defendants Epson Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics America, Inc. 12 13 14 HAGLUND KELLEY JONES & WILDER, LLP 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Dated: September 25, 2013 By: /s/ Michael E. Haglund Michael E. Haglund, OSB No. 77203 (Pro Hac Vice) Michel K. Kelley, OSB No. 85378 (Pro Hac Vice) Special Assistant Attorneys General Telephone: (503) 225-0777 Facsimile: (503) 225-1257 Tim D. Nord, OSB No. 882800 Oregon Senior Assistant Attorney General 1162 Court Street, NE Salem, OR 97301-4096 Telephone: (503) 943-4400 Facsimile: (503) 225-1257 Tim.D.Nord@doj.state.or.us Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Oregon 25 26 ATTESTATION: Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in 27 the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the signatories. 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING REVISED DEADLINES NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI; NO. 3:10-CV-4346 SI 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 5 9/30/13 Dated: The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Court Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING REVISED DEADLINES NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI; NO. 3:10-CV-4346 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?