State of Oregon v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Filing
138
ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting (8628) Stipulation in case 3:07-md-01827-SI Order Setting Revised State of Oregon Deadlines filed by HannStar Display Corporation (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
12
No. 3:07-md-1827-SI
MDL No. 1827
13
14
State of Oregon v. AU Optronics Corp., et al.,
15
Case No. 3:10-cv-4346-SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SETTING REVISED STATE OF
OREGON DEADLINES
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING REVISED DEADLINES
NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI; NO. 3:11-CV-4346 SI
1
2
WHEREAS the above-captioned case has been proceeding with pretrial preparation in
3
accordance with the Court’s Order dated March 22, 2103 (Dkt. No. 7665) and the deadline for
4
close of limited fact discovery unique to the State of Oregon case is presently September 30,
5
2013;
WHEREAS counsel for the State of Oregon and counsel for defendants in the State of
6
7
Oregon case believe additional time is needed to complete fact and expert discovery unique to the
8
case;
WHEREAS, counsel for the State of Oregon and defendants have met and conferred and
9
10
determined that an approximate six-week extension of all current deadlines would be appropriate;
11
and
12
13
WHEREAS an extension for deadlines in the State of Oregon case will not prejudice any
of the parties or the Court because trial dates have not been scheduled for the case.
14
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the State of Oregon and
15
defendants’ liaison counsel, and subject to the concurrence of the Court, that the State of Oregon
16
case will adopt the following schedule:
17
Event
Current Date (pursuant
to 3/18/13 Order)
Revised Date
Close of limited fact discovery unique
to State of Oregon case
September 30, 2013
November 15, 2013
Service of opening expert reports for
plaintiffs
October 21, 2013
December 6, 2013
23
Service of underlying data and Code
October 25, 2013
December 13, 2013
24
Service of opposition expert Reports
January 21, 2014
March 7, 2014
25
Service of underlying data and Code
January 27, 2014
March 14, 2014
Plaintiffs and Defendants to Serve
Proposed List of Summary Judgment
Motions (Copies to be Provided to the
Court)
February 17, 2014
March 31, 2014
18
19
20
21
22
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING REVISED DEADLINES
NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI; NO. 3:10-CV-4346 SI
1
2
Current Date (pursuant
to 3/18/13 Order)
Revised Date
February 17, 2014 –
February 28, 2014
March 31, 2014 –
April 4, 2014
Plaintiffs and Defendants to File with
the Court Joint List of Proposed
Summary Judgment Motions and
Proposed Schedule for Summary
Judgment Filings
March 10, 2014
April 25, 2014
10
Service of reply expert reports
March 24, 2014
May 9, 2014
11
Service of underlying data and Code
March 31, 2014
May 16, 2014
12
Close of expert discovery
April 30, 2014
June 13, 2014
13
Last Day to File Supplemental List of
Proposed Summary Judgment Motions
Based Upon New Information or Issues
Raised in the Reply Expert Reports
April 30, 2014
June 13, 2014
16
Last day to file dispositive Motions
May 30, 2014
July 11, 2014
17
Last day to file oppositions to
dispositive motions
July 11, 2014
August 22, 2014
August 22, 2014
October 3, 2014
September 5, 2014
October 17, 2014
Event
3
4
5
Plaintiffs and Defendants to Meet and
Confer Over Proposed List of Summary
Judgment Motions and Schedule for
Same
6
7
8
9
14
15
18
19
Last day to file reply briefs in support
of dispositive motions
20
Last day for hearing dispositive motions
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING REVISED DEADLINES
NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI; NO. 3:10-CV-4346 SI
1
2
FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP
3
4
Dated: September 25, 2013
5
By: /s/ Jessica N. Leal
10
Robert E. Freitas (SBN 80948)
Jason S. Angell (SBN 221607)
Jessica N. Leal (SBN 267232)
Facsimile: (650) 593-6301
FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP
100 Marine Parkway, Suite 200
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: (650) 593-6300
rfreitas@ftklaw.com
jangell@ftklaw.com
jleal@ftklaw.com
11
Attorneys for Defendant HannStar Display Corp.
6
7
8
9
12
13
NOSSAMAN LLP
14
Dated: September 25, 2013
By: /s. Carl L. Blumenstein
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Christopher A. Nedeau (SBN 81297)
Carl L. Blumenstein (SBN 124158)
Farschad Farzan (SBN 215194)
Natasha A. Saggar Sheth (SBN 282896)
NOSSAMAN LLP
50 California Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 398-3600
Facsimile: (415) 398-2438
cnedeau@nossaman.com
cblumenstein@nossaman.com
ffarzan@nossaman.com
nsaggarsheth@nossaman.com
22
23
Attorneys for Defendants AU Optronics Corp. and AU
Optronics Corporation America
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING REVISED DEADLINES
NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI; NO. 3:10-CV-4346 SI
1
WHITE & CASE LLP
2
3
Dated: September 25, 2013
4
By: /s/ Christopher M. Curran
Christopher M. Curran (pro hac vice)
Email: ccurran@whitecase.com
J. Mark Gidley (pro hac vice)
Email: mgidley@whitecase.com
Martin M. Toto (pro hac vice)
Email: mtoto@whitecase.com
John H. Chung (pro hac vice)
Email: jchung@whitecase.com
White & Case LLP
1155 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Telephone:
(212) 819-8200
Facsimile:
(212) 354-8113
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Attorneys for Toshiba Corp.; Toshiba Mobile Display
Co., Ltd.; Toshiba America Electronic Components,
Inc.; and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.
12
13
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Dated: September 25, 2013
By: /s/ Jacob R. Sorensen
JOHN M. GRENFELL (CA Bar No. 88500)
john.grenfell@pillsburylaw.com
JACOB R. SORENSEN (CA Bar No. 209134)
jake.sorensen@pillsburylaw.com
FUSAE NARA (pro hac vice)
fusae.nara@pillsburylaw.com
ANDREW D. LANPHERE (CA Bar No. 191479)
andrew.lanphere@pillsburylaw.com
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 983-1000
Facsimile: (415) 983-1200
Attorneys for Defendants Sharp Corp. and
Sharp Electronics Corp.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING REVISED DEADLINES
NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI; NO. 3:10-CV-4346 SI
1
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON
2
3
4
Dated: September 25, 2013
By: /s/ Robert D. Wick
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
Robert D. Wick
Neil K. Roman
Derek Ludwin
1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20004
Telephone: (202) 662-6000
Facsimile: (202) 662-6291
Email: rwick@cov.com
nroman@cov.com
dludwin@cov.com
5
6
7
8
9
10
Attorneys for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co.,
Ltd.; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; and Samsung
Semiconductor, Inc.
11
12
13
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Dated: September 25, 2013
By: /s/ Lee F. Berger
Holly A. House (State Bar No. 136045)
Kevin C. McCann (State Bar No. 120874)
Lee F. Berger (State Bar No. 222756)
Sean Unger (State Bar No. 231694)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street
Twenty-Fourth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 856-7000
Facsimile: (415) 856-7100
kevinmccann@paulhastings.com
hollyhouse@paulhastings.com
leeberger@paulhastings.com
seanunger@paulhastings.com
Attorneys for Defendants LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG
Display America, Inc.
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING REVISED DEADLINES
NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI; NO. 3:10-CV-4346 SI
1
DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP
2
3
Dated: September 25, 2013
By: /s/ Neal A. Potischman
4
Neal A. Potischman (SBN 254862)
Christopher B. Hockett (SBN 121539)
Sandra West Neukom (SBN 250389)
Samantha H. Knox (SBN 254427)
DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP
1600 El Camino Real
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: (650) 752-2000
Facsimile: (650) 752-2111
5
6
7
8
9
10
Counsel for Defendants Chi Mei Corporation,
Chimei Innolux Corporation (f/k/a Chi Mei
Optoelectronics Corp.), Chi Mei Optoelectronics
USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Nexgen
Mediatech Inc. and Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc.
11
12
13
14
MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Dated: September 25, 2013
By: /s/ Kent M. Roger
KENT M. ROGER (SBN 95987)
HERMAN J. HOYING (SBN 257495)
MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 442-1000
Facsimile: (415) 442-1001
Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi
Displays, Ltd. (n/k/a Japan Display Inc.) and Hitachi
Electronic Devices, (USA), Inc.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING REVISED DEADLINES
NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI; NO. 3:10-CV-4346 SI
1
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
2
3
Dated: September 25, 2013
By: /s/ Stephen P. Freccero
4
Melvin R. Goldman (SBN 34097)
Stephen P. Freccero (SBN 131093)
Derek F. Foran (SBN 224569)
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 268-7000
Facsimile: (415) 268-7522
mgoldman@mofo.com
sfreccero@mofo.com
dforan@mofo.com
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Attorneys for Defendants Epson Imaging Devices
Corporation and Epson Electronics America, Inc.
12
13
14
HAGLUND KELLEY JONES & WILDER, LLP
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Dated: September 25, 2013
By: /s/ Michael E. Haglund
Michael E. Haglund, OSB No. 77203 (Pro Hac Vice)
Michel K. Kelley, OSB No. 85378 (Pro Hac Vice)
Special Assistant Attorneys General
Telephone: (503) 225-0777
Facsimile: (503) 225-1257
Tim D. Nord, OSB No. 882800
Oregon Senior Assistant Attorney General
1162 Court Street, NE
Salem, OR 97301-4096
Telephone: (503) 943-4400
Facsimile: (503) 225-1257
Tim.D.Nord@doj.state.or.us
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Oregon
25
26
ATTESTATION: Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in
27
the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the signatories.
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING REVISED DEADLINES
NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI; NO. 3:10-CV-4346 SI
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
9/30/13
Dated:
The Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Court Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING REVISED DEADLINES
NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI; NO. 3:10-CV-4346 SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?