OEM-Tech, Co. v. Video Gaming Technologies Inc
Filing
173
ORDER RE: LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/31/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
8
OEM-TECH, d/b/a CHARLES ESTES,
10
Plaintiff,
No. C 10-04368 RS
ORDER RE: LEAVE TO AMEND
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
9
12
v.
VIDEO GAMING TECHNOLOGIES,
INC., and DOES 1-50,
13
14
Defendants.
____________________________________/
15
16
Plaintiff was granted leave to amend in this Court’s prior order granting defendant’s motion
17
for partial summary judgment and motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 169), and subsequently filed
18
amended pleadings, including one longer complaint (Dkt. No. 171), apparently in error. Plaintiff’s
19
most recent filing, styled as a proposed order (Dkt. No. 172), indicates that the intended operative
20
complaint is the “6th Amended Complaint Short Form” (Dkt. No. 170). Upon review, that
21
document appears to comport with the scope of leave to amend granted plaintiff in the prior order,
22
and it is therefore deemed the operative pleading.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
Dated: 8/31/12
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
NO. C 10-04368 RS
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?