IO Group, Inc., v. Does 1-50 Inclusive
Filing
27
ORDER CONSTRUING DEFENDANT GONZALEZ'S MAY 16, 2011 LETTER AS AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 5/24/2011. (Attachments: # 1 proof of service as to gonzalez)(cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
IO GROUP INC,
11
No. C-10-04378 EDL
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER CONSTRUING DEFENDANT
GONZALEZ’S MAY 16, 2011 LETTER AS
AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT
v.
13
14
DOES 1-50,
Defendant.
15
/
16
On May 19, 2011, the Court received a letter, with attachments, dated May 16, 2011 from
17
18
19
Defendant Mayra Gonzalez. The Court construes this letter as Defendant Gonzalez’s Answer to
Plaintiff’s Complaint and will e-file it.
The Court informs Defendant that any further communications with the Court must be served
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
on all parties of record in this case. Further, Defendant may wish to seek assistance from the Legal
Help Center, a free service of the Volunteer Legal Services Program, by calling 415.782.9000 x8657
or signing up for an appointment on the 15th Floor of the Courthouse, Room 2796. At the Legal
Help Center, Defendant may speak with an attorney who may be able to provide basic legal help, but
not legal representation. The Court also urges Defendant to obtain a copy of the Pro Se Handbook,
available free of charge from the Court's website (www.cand.uscourts.gov) or in the Clerk's Office
//
//
//
1
on the 16th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA.
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: May _24_, 2011
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?