Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. CVS Caremark Corp et al

Filing 11

JOINT CONSENT DECREE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/27/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2011)

Download PDF
*E-Filed 5/27/11* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 WILLIAM R. TAMAYO (CA Bar No. 084965) DAVID F. OFFEN-BROWN (CA Bar No. 063321) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION San Francisco District Office 350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94105-1260 Telephone No. (415) 625-5652 Facsimile No. (415) 625-5657 Attorneys for Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission GARY R. SINISCALCO (STATE BAR NO. 64770) grsiniscalco@orrick.com MICHAEL D. WEIL (STATE BAR NO. 209056) mweil@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP The Orrick Building 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2669 Telephone: 1-415-773-5700 Facsimile: 1-415-773-5759 TIMOTHY J. LONG (State Bar No. 137591) tjlong@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 400 Capitol Mall Sacramento, CA 95814-4497 Telephone: (916) 447-9200 Facsimile: (916) 329-4900 Attorneys for Defendants CVS Caremark Corp. and Longs Drug Stores LLC 18 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 22 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, 23 24 25 26 OAKLAND DIVISION Civil Action No. 3:10-CV-04384-RS Plaintiff, vs. JOINT CONSENT DECREE CVS CAREMARK CORP. and LONGS DRUG STORES CALIFORNIA LLC., Defendants. 27 28 Case No. 3:10-CV-04384-RS OHS WEST:261118117.2 1 2 INTRODUCTION 1. 3 Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Commission or EEOC) 4 filed this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) and Title I of the Civil 5 Rights Act of 1991 to correct alleged unlawful employment practices on the basis of sex, race, 6 and retaliation, and to provide appropriate relief to Charging Party Marcia Guaman (Charging 7 Party). 8 9 2. The Commission alleged that defendant Longs Drug Stores California LLC (formerly Longs Drug Stores California Inc.) subjected Charging Party to disparate treatment in 10 terms and conditions of employment, discipline, and discharge based on her race, Black, and 11 gender, female, and retaliation. Charging Party was employed in Longs’ general offices in 12 Antioch, California. The Commission alleges that the disparate treatment took place in Longs’ 13 general office in Antioch, California and was committed by Charging Party’s then-supervisor. 14 3. Defendant CVS Caremark Corp. (CVS) acquired Defendant Longs after the 15 alleged discrimination took place. CVS consents to this Court’s jurisdiction during the term of 16 this Consent Decree as Defendant Long’s successor in interest. 17 4. The Commission, Defendant Longs, and CVS, (hereinafter referenced collectively 18 as Parties) want to finally resolve all claims that were made or could have been made by the 19 Commission on behalf of Marcia Guaman based upon her charge of discrimination, EEOC 20 Charge No. 555-2008-00607C, by entry of this consent decree (Decree). This Decree is not an 21 adjudication of or a finding on the merits of this lawsuit and shall not be construed as an 22 admission of any violation of Title VII by CVS or Longs. 23 24 25 26 5. The Court has reviewed this Decree in light of the pleadings, the record herein, and the applicable law, and now approves this Decree. THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: GENERAL PROVISIONS 27 28 Case No. 3:10-CV-04384-RS OHS WEST:261118117.2 -2- 1 6. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the Parties to this lawsuit. 2 This court will retain jurisdiction over this Decree for all purposes until the expiration of 3 Defendants’ obligations as set forth herein. 4 7. This Decree is the full and final resolution of all claims that were made or could 5 have been made by the Commission on behalf of Marcia Guaman based upon her charge of 6 discrimination, EEOC Charge No. 555-2008-00607C, and the Commission’s complaint in this 7 action. This Decree does not, however, resolve any future charges or other charges that may be 8 pending with the EEOC. This Decree is final and binding upon the Parties to this Decree and 9 their successors and assigns. 10 8. This Decree shall become effective upon its entry by the Court. 11 9. The Parties to this Decree shall each be responsible for its own costs and attorneys’ 12 fees. 13 GENERAL INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 14 10. Discrimination: Officers and managers who were employed in Longs’ Antioch 15 general offices or in Longs’ human resources department in California and who are currently 16 employed by CVS are enjoined from discriminating against persons on the basis of race, sex or 17 retaliation in the terms and conditions of employment, including discipline and discharge. 18 11. Retaliation: CVS is enjoined from retaliating against any current or former 19 employee of Defendant Longs or CVS because he or she has in the past, or during the term of this 20 Decree (a) testified or participated in any manner in any investigation into claims of 21 discrimination or retaliation (including, without limitation, any internal investigation undertaken 22 by Defendant Longs or CVS) in connection with this lawsuit, proceeding in connection with this 23 lawsuit or hearing in connection with this lawsuit; (b) opposed the alleged treatment of Charging 24 Party; (c) was identified as a possible witness in this lawsuit; (d) asserted any rights under this 25 Decree; or (e) sought and/or received any monetary or non-monetary relief in accordance with 26 this Decree. 27 MONETARY RELIEF 28 Case No. 3:10-CV-04384-RS OHS WEST:261118117.2 -3- 1 12. The EEOC has asserted that Ms. Guaman has suffered damages, including 2 emotional distress in connection with the alleged unlawful conduct. Within fifteen (15) business 3 days after entry of this Decree, Defendant CVS agrees to pay the total sum of $55,000.00 (Fifty- 4 Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents) (the Settlement Amount) to Marcia Guaman. The 5 Settlement Amount will be sent via overnight mail and will be paid in two checks. The first 6 check will be in the amount of $27,500.00 (Twenty-Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and 7 No Cents) subject to usual and customary payroll deductions and withholdings. The second 8 check will be in the amount of $27,500.00 (Twenty-Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and 9 No Cents), and will not be subject to any withholdings. CVS will issue a W-2 for the first check 10 and a Form 1099 for the second check. CVS takes no position whatsoever as to the nature and 11 characterization of the settlement payments or Ms. Guaman’s alleged damages. 12 13. The EEOC shall have Ms. Guaman provide a completed Form W-4 to CVS and 13 provide CVS’s attorneys with the address at which to send Charging Party the checks. At the 14 time that CVS sends the checks to Marcia Guaman, it shall provide a copy of the checks to David 15 Offen-Brown, Supervisory Trial Attorney, EEOC, 350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500, San 16 Francisco, CA 94105-1260. 17 IV. SPECIFIC INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 18 EEO and Harassment Policies 19 14. CVS agrees to amend its EEO policy to clarify and confirm that CVS prohibits 20 discrimination based on all protected categories, including race, color, national origin, religion, 21 sex, age, and disability, and refer employees to its complaint procedure for complaints about 22 alleged discrimination based on those categories. CVS will also amend its complaint and 23 investigation procedures for Workplace Violence, Workplace Harassment and Sexual Harassment 24 to clarify that such procedures also apply to reporting and investigating unlawful discrimination. 25 CVS further agrees to amend its EEO policies to clarify and confirm, to the extent not already 26 stated, that its policies (i) prohibit race and sex discrimination; (ii) provide for appropriate 27 discipline and/or corrective action for incidents of discrimination; (iii) provide employees with 28 convenient, confidential, and reliable mechanisms for reporting incidents of discrimination; (iv) Case No. 3:10-CV-04384-RS OHS WEST:261118117.2 -4- 1 provide that complaints of discrimination will be accepted irrespective of whether they are made 2 verbally or in writing and provide information about person(s) with whom employees can lodge a 3 complaint, including ways to contact them; (v) provide that CVS shall undertake reasonable 4 efforts to maintain anonymity of complainants and confidentiality of complaints in a manner 5 consistent with applicable law; (vi) provide that CVS will promptly commence an investigation 6 after a complaint is made or received and for appropriate remedial action, if warranted, to be 7 taken upon conclusion of an investigation; and (vii) indicate that, upon the conclusion of the 8 investigation of a complaint, CVS will communicate to the complaining party the determination 9 of the investigation. 10 15. The EEOC and CVS agree that, within 90 days of the effective date of this Decree, 11 the policy revisions requested by the EEOC, referenced in paragraph 14 above, shall be made to 12 CVS’s electronic policies that are maintained on CVS’s intranet and in its electronic copy of the 13 employee handbook. CVS agrees that, all copies of the employee handbook that are printed after 14 the changes are made shall include the revised policies, referenced in paragraph 14. Within 90 15 days of the effective date of this Decree, CVS agrees to provide notice of the revised policies to 16 its employees by posting notices of the change in employee break rooms at CVS locations. To the 17 extent old versions of the employee handbook are distributed to new-hire employees in California 18 90 days or more after the effective date of this Decree, CVS agrees to include at the same time a 19 one page notice in its new hire orientation materials, which it is CVS policy and practice to give 20 to all new hires and which include the employee handbook, advising the new hire California 21 employees of the policy revisions. 22 Training of Employees 23 16. CVS shall provide and require all Human Resource Business Partners, Human 24 Resources Employee Relations Managers, Human Resources Directors employed in California as 25 of the date this Decree is entered and all Buyer supervisors, Human Resource Business Partners, 26 Human Resources Employee Relations Managers, and Human Resources Directors who were 27 employed by Longs prior to CVS’s acquisition and are currently employed by CVS, if any, to 28 receive anti-discrimination training, exclusive of training given during orientation, at least once Case No. 3:10-CV-04384-RS OHS WEST:261118117.2 -5- 1 every other year (consistent with California law requiring that management employees to receive 2 training once every other year (see California Government Code § 12950.1) for a cumulative total 3 of no less than three hours, while the Decree remains in effect. The purpose of said training shall 4 be to give participants an understanding or refresher about race and sex and retaliation 5 discrimination, the employer’s obligation to take preventive, investigative, and remedial action 6 with respect to discrimination complaints, and to review company policies (including discipline 7 policies) and practices related to race and sex and retaliation discrimination with CVS employees. 8 Training Logistics 9 17. CVS agrees to provide the qualifications of the trainer(s), the job titles of the 10 employees trained, and a summary description of each training program and the date, time and 11 location of the training to counsel for the Commission no later than twenty (20) days after each of 12 the training programs are held. All persons attending mandatory training pursuant to this Decree 13 shall sign an acknowledgment of their attendance at the training, the date thereof, and their 14 position with the Company. CVS shall retain the originals of these acknowledgments and provide 15 the EEOC with a copy thereof within 20 days after the training occurs. 16 Disclosure of Information Regarding Marcia Guaman 17 18. CVS shall not disclose any information or make references to any charges of 18 discrimination or this lawsuit in responding to employment reference requests for information 19 about Ms. Guaman. CVS shall only provide the following information about Ms. Guaman: 20 i. In response to a specific inquiry, CVS may disclose dates of employment, 21 position held and final rate of pay. CVS shall explain that it is its policy to provide only the 22 identified information in response to reference requests; 23 24 ii. iii. 27 28 CVS may disclose information as required by Court order or subpoena. and 25 26 CVS may report any information as required to state or federal authorities; EXPIRATION OF CONSENT DECREE 19. This Decree shall terminate two (2) years from the date of its entry by the Court, unless the Commission petitions this Court for extension of this Decree because of Case No. 3:10-CV-04384-RS OHS WEST:261118117.2 -6- 1 noncompliance by CVS. If the Commission determines that CVS has not complied with this 2 Decree, the Commission will provide written notification of alleged breach to CVS and will not 3 petition the Court for enforcement sooner than thirty (30) days after providing written 4 notification. The thirty-day period following written notice shall be used by the Parties to the 5 Decree for good faith efforts to resolve the issue. If the Commission petitions the Court and the 6 Court finds CVS to be in violation of the terms of this Decree, the Court may extend this Decree. 7 On behalf of Plaintiff Commission On behalf of Defendants Date: May 24, 2011 Date: May 24, 2011 U. S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Attorneys for Defendant 8 9 10 11 12 13 ____/s/________________ WILLIAM R. TAMAYO 14 15 16 17 18 ____/s/____________ Michael Weil_____________ Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP ___/s/_________________ DAVID F. OFFEN-BROWN Attorneys for Plaintiff EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 19 ORDER 20 21 It is so ordered. 22 23 Dated: 5/27/11 ________________________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:10-CV-04384-RS OHS WEST:261118117.2 -7-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?