Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Regis Corp.

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 28 TO CONTINUE DEADLINES AND SHOW CAUSE HEARING. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 9/22/2011 01:30 PM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/31/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2011)

*E-Filed 8/31/11*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

WILLIAM R. TAMAYO, SBN 084965
JONATHAN T. PECK, #12303 (VA)
MARCIA L. MITCHELL #18122 (WA)
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
San Francisco District Office
350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA 94105-1260
Telephone No. [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Catherine M. Dacre (SBN 141988) [e-mail]
Ari Hersher (SBN 260321) [e-mail]
560 Mission Street, 31st Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone No. [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,

Case No. 3:10-cv-04412 RS

17
Plaintiff,
18
19
20

v.
REGIS CORP. dba MINNESOTA
REGIS CORP., SUPERCUTS
CORPORATE SHOPS, INC., a wholly
owned subsidiary of REGIS CORP.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE DEADLINES AND SHOW
CAUSE HEARING
Hearing Date: September 8, 2011, 1:30 p.m.

21
Defendants.
22
23
24

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-12 and 16-2, it is hereby stipulated, by and between EQUAL

25

EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION (“Plaintiff”) and SUPERCUTS CORPORATE

26

SHOPS, INC. (“Defendant”) (collectively “the Parties”), through their respective undersigned

27

counsel, as follows:

28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO
CONTINUE DEADLINES
Case No. 3:10-cv-04412 RS

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

1.

The Parties participated in court-ordered ADR on June 22, 2011, and reached a tentative

settlement agreement. On June 28, 2011, the Court issued a Standby Order to Show Cause
requiring the Parties to file a stipulation of dismissal by August 23, 2011, or appear on September
8, 2011, to show cause why the case should not be dismissed. [Docket No. 27].
2.

The Parties have been working to incorporate the terms of the settlement into a Consent

Decree and also have been drafting a Release of Claims for the complainant in this case.
3.

Negotiations regarding the Consent Decree and Release of Claims were delayed because

attorneys for both Parties had extended periods of absence from the office during which they were
unavailable to work toward finalization of the settlement.
4.

The Parties continue to negotiate in good faith, and are very close to a negotiated

resolution, but need additional time to finalize the Consent Decree and Release of Claims.
5.

Based on the foregoing, the Parties request a continuance until September 13, 2011, to file

a Consent Decree and a continuance until September 22, 2011, of the show cause hearing.

14
15

DATED: August 30, 2011

16

BY: //s// Marcia L. Mitchell
MARCIA L. MITCHELL
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Attorney for Plaintiff EEOC

17
18
19

DATED: August 30, 2011

20

BY: //s// Ari Hersher
ARI HERSHER
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Attorney for Defendant Supercuts Corporate Shops, Inc.

21
22
23
24

E-filing concurrence: I, Marcia L. Mitchell, attorney for Plaintiff EEOC, attest that I have
obtained the concurrence of attorneys for defendant Supercuts Corporate Shops, Inc., for the filing of
the instant pleading.

25
DATED: August 30, 2011

BY: //s// Marcia L. Mitchell

26
27
28

MARCIA L. MITCHELL
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Attorney for Plaintiff EEOC
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO
CONTINUE DEADLINES
Case No. 3:10-cv-04412 RS

2.

1
2
3

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 8/31

, 2011

THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG

4
5
6

By:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO
CONTINUE DEADLINES
Case No. 3:10-cv-04412 RS
13718853v.1

3.