Innospan Corp v. Intuit et al

Filing 331

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REVIEW COSTS re 328 Request filed by Hong-Seok Kim. Signed by Judge Alsup on August 6, 2012. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/6/2012: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

INNOSPAN CORP,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER DENYING MOTION
TO REVIEW COSTS

INTUIT INC., et al.
Defendants.
/

14
15

No. C 10-04422 WHA

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
/

16
17

Pro se counter-defendant Hong-Seok Kim’s request to review the clerk’s taxation of costs

18

is DENIED. Defendant Intuit, Inc., the prevailing party in this litigation, is presumptively entitled

19

to its costs. FED. R. CIV. P. 54(d)(1). The Court granted Intuit’s Rule 41 motion against counter-

20

defendant Kim on April 4, 2012, and issued final judgment (Dkt. Nos. 306, 307). Kim has

21

appealed the judgment against him (Dkt. No. 317). It is clear that Intuit is the prevailing party,

22

and there is no reason to reverse the clerk’s taxation of costs.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: August 6, 2012.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE