United States Small Business Administration v. Rocket Ventures II, L.P. et al

Filing 70

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 69 TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 5/21/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:10-cv-04425-JSW Document69 Filed05/17/12 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 COOLEY LLP GORDON C. ATKINSON (122401) (atkinsongc@cooley.com) ABIGAIL E. PRINGLE (272548) (apringle@cooley.com) 101 California Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5800 Telephone: (415) 693-2000 Facsimile: (415) 693-2222 Attorneys for Defendants ROCKET VENTURES II, L.P.; ROCKET VENTURES II CEO FUND, L.P.; and ROCKET VENTURES SBIC PARTNERS, LLC 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION in its capacity as Receiver for ROCKET VENTURES II SBIC, L.P., 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff, v. ROCKET VENTURES II, L.P., a California limited partnership; ROCKET VENTURES II CEO FUND, L.P., a California limited partnership; and ROCKET VENTURES SBIC PARTNERS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; Cordusio Societa Fiduciaria Per Azioni Lozia Federico; Kenneth W. & Melissa Baldwin; Paul Cantwell; Peter Ayrton Cheese; Yves Derville; Richard S. Cuccioli; Alistair Anderson Donald; Philippe Gire; Jean-Claude Guez; Joseph Hawes & Christopher Eyden; Alan John Healey; Craig Foster Heimark; David E. Kropp; Gregory Charles Meekings; Michele Liberato; Fred Cucchi; ValorLife; Alberto Gandini; Rijete Pty. Ltd.; Christopher Stainton; Tyna Development; Thomas Tynan; Patrice Vinet; Hahei Limited; Michael Saunier; Michel Roujansky; Nigel Backwith; Justine Lumb; Andrew Middleton; Ajmair Singh Bhullar; Estate of Grant A. Dove; Luca Casiraghi; David Mather, 27 Case No. CV-10-4425 JSW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER BETWEEN PLAINTIFF RECEIVER AND DEFENDANTS ROCKET VENTURES II, L.P., ROCKET VENTURES II CEO FUND, L.P., AND ROCKET VENTURES SBIC PARTNERS, LLC TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. 28 COOLEY LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO 1270051/SF 1. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO SUJ MOTION (CASE NO. CV-10-4425-JSW) Case3:10-cv-04425-JSW Document69 Filed05/17/12 Page2 of 3 1 Defendants Rocket Ventures II, L.P., Rocket Ventures II CEO Fund, L.P., and Rocket 2 Ventures SBIC Partners, LLC (“Defendants”) and Plaintiff United States Business Administration 3 in its capacity as Receiver for Rocket Ventures II SBIC, L.P. (“Plaintiff Receiver”), by and 4 through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 5 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Receiver filed a motion for summary judgment on April 3, 2012; 6 WHEREAS, Defendants’ opposition to the motion for summary judgment is presently due 7 on May 18, 2012; 8 WHEREAS, the Parties agree to permit additional time for Defendants to respond to 9 Plaintiff Receiver’s motion and agree that such additional time to respond shall not affect the due 10 date of Plaintiff Receiver’s reply nor the date of the hearing on the motion; 11 FOR THE REASONS set forth above: 12 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND ORDERED THAT: 13 1. 14 extended to and including May 22, 2012 and shall be filed no later than 5:00 p.m. (PDT); 15 16 Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiff Receiver’s motion for summary judgment is 2. Plaintiff Receiver’s reply in support of its motion for summary judgment due on May 29, 2012 will remain the same; and 17 3. 18 the same. 19 //// 20 //// 21 //// 22 //// 23 //// 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// The hearing on the motion for summary judgment on June 15, 2012 will remain COOLEY LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO 1270051 /SF 2. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO SUJ MOTION (CASE NO. CV-10-4425-JSW) Case3:10-cv-04425-JSW Document69 Filed05/17/12 Page3 of 3 1 SO STIPULATED. 2 3 Dated: May 17, 2012 COOLEY LLP 4 5 By: /s/ Gordon C. Atkinson Gordon C. Atkinson 6 Attorneys for Defendants ROCKET VENTURES II, L.P., ROCKET VENTURES II CEO FUND, L.P. and ROCKET VENTURES SBIC PARTNERS, LLC 7 8 9 Dated: May 17, 2011 10 SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP 11 By: /s/ T. Scott Tate T. Scott Tate 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION in its capacity as Receiver for ROCKET VENTURES II SBIC, L.P. 14 15 16 17 Filer’s Attestation re signatures: Gordon C. Atkinson hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. ORDER 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED: 20 21 21 Dated: May ___, 2012 Honorable Jeffrey S. White United States District Court Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO 1270051 /SF 3. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO SUJ MOTION (CASE NO. CV-10-4425-JSW)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?